Infants Prospectively Control Reaching Based on the Difficulty of Future Actions: To What Extent Can Infants’ Multiple-Step Actions Be Explained by Fitts’ Law?

Prospective motor control, a key element of action planning, is the ability to adjust one’s actions with respect to task demands and action goals in an anticipatory manner. The current study investigates whether 14-month-olds can prospectively control their reaching actions based on the difficulty of the subsequent action. We used a reach-to-place task, with difficulty of the placing action varied by goal size and goal distance. To target prospective motor control, we determined the kinematics of the prior reaching movements using a motion-tracking system. Peak velocity of the first movement unit of the reach served as indicator for prospective motor control. Both difficulty aspects (goal size and goal distance) affected prior reaching, suggesting that both these aspects of the subsequent action have an impact on the prior action. The smaller the goal size and the longer the distance to the goal, the slower infants were in the beginning of their reach toward the object. Additionally, we modeled movement times of both reaching and placing actions using a formulation of Fitts’ law (as in heading). The model was significant for placement and reaching movement times. These findings suggest that 14-month-olds can plan their future actions and prospectively control their related movements with respect to future task difficulties.

[1]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  A. H. Norris,et al.  Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[3]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[6]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Structuring of early reaching movements: a longitudinal study. , 1991 .

[8]  C. Hofsten Prospective Control: A Basic Aspect of Action Development , 1993 .

[9]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Laura J. Claxton,et al.  Evidence of Motor Planning in Infant Reaching Behavior , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  M. E. McCarty,et al.  Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension , 2004 .

[12]  C. Hofsten An action perspective on motor development , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Thelen,et al.  The developmental roots of the speed-accuracy trade-off. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Elizabeth A. Ware,et al.  Different Gestalt processing for different actions? Comparing object-directed reaching and looking time measures. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

[15]  C. Armbrüster,et al.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? , 2006, Motor control.

[16]  Afdc Hamilton,et al.  The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions , 2007 .

[17]  Object Representation in Infants' Coordination of Manipulative Force. , 2007 .

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Planning actions in autism , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. Keen,et al.  Movement planning reflects skill level and age changes in toddlers. , 2010, Child development.

[20]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. Von Hofsten,et al.  Reaching strategies of very preterm infants at 8 months corrected age , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Predictive gaze shifts elicited during observed and performed actions in 10-month-old infants and adults , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  A. Barnett,et al.  Reaching to throw compared to reaching to place: a comparison across individuals with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[24]  A. Barnett,et al.  To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object? , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Michiel M. A. Spapé,et al.  The developing cognitive substrate of sequential action control in 9- to 12-month-olds: Evidence for concurrent activation models , 2015, Cognition.

[26]  Janna M. Gottwald,et al.  Infants’ prospective control during object manipulation in an uncertain environment , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Janna M. Gottwald,et al.  An Embodied Account of Early Executive-Function Development , 2016, Psychological science.

[28]  Janna M. Gottwald Infants in Control: Prospective Motor Control and Executive Functions in Action Development , 2016 .

[29]  Gustaf Gredebäck,et al.  The TimeStudio Project: An open source scientific workflow system for the behavioral and brain sciences , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.