Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images

This study presents a finite element-based computational model to simulate the three-dimensional deformation of a breast and fibroglandular tissues under compression. The simulation was based on 3D MR images of the breast, and craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique compression, as used in mammography, was applied. The geometry of the whole breast and the segmented fibroglandular tissues within the breast were reconstructed using triangular meshes by using the Avizo 6.0 software package. Due to the large deformation in breast compression, a finite element model was used to simulate the nonlinear elastic tissue deformation under compression, using the MSC.Marc software package. The model was tested in four cases. The results showed a higher displacement along the compression direction compared to the other two directions. The compressed breast thickness in these four cases at a compression ratio of 60% was in the range of 5-7 cm, which is a typical range of thickness in mammography. The projection of the fibroglandular tissue mesh at a compression ratio of 60% was compared to the corresponding mammograms of two women, and they demonstrated spatially matched distributions. However, since the compression was based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has much coarser spatial resolution than the in-plane resolution of mammography, this method is unlikely to generate a synthetic mammogram close to the clinical quality. Whether this model may be used to understand the technical factors that may impact the variations in breast density needs further investigation. Since this method can be applied to simulate compression of the breast at different views and different compression levels, another possible application is to provide a tool for comparing breast images acquired using different imaging modalities--such as MRI, mammography, whole breast ultrasound and molecular imaging--that are performed using different body positions and under different compression conditions.

[1]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  Luc Chevalier,et al.  Hyperelastic constitutive model for rubber-like materials based on the first Seth strain measures invariant , 2006 .

[3]  T. Sellers,et al.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Jean-Christophe Cuillière An adaptive method for the automatic triangulation of 3D parametric surfaces , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  A New Validation Method for X-ray Mammogram Registration Algorithms Using a Projection Model of Breast X-ray Compression , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Norman F. Boyd,et al.  Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological , 2008 .

[8]  J. G. Khor,et al.  Fuzzy logic fundamentals , 2002 .

[9]  Michael J. Carston,et al.  An Automated Approach for Estimation of Breast Density , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[10]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  M. Doblaré,et al.  A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  J. Schnabel,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[14]  C. Klifa,et al.  Quantification of breast tissue index from MR data using fuzzy clustering , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  John L Hopper,et al.  The Heritability of Mammographically Dense and Nondense Breast Tissue , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Comparison of a New and Existing Method of Mammographic Density Measurement: Intramethod Reliability and Associations with Known Risk Factors , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[17]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Rainer Bader,et al.  A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: Modeling and experimental validation , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[19]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Michael Khazen,et al.  A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[22]  R. Rivlin Large Elastic Deformations of Isotropic Materials , 1997 .

[23]  Cornelius O. Horgan,et al.  Compression tests and constitutive models for the slight compressibility of elastic rubber-like materials , 2009 .

[24]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Using Clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast Cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a New Predictive Model , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Ferris M Hall Mammographically determined breast density and cancer risk. , 2008, Radiology.

[26]  V Shane Pankratz,et al.  Longitudinal Trends in Mammographic Percent Density and Breast Cancer Risk , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[27]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Methods for Modeling and Predicting Mechanical Deformations of the Breast Under External Perturbations , 2001, MICCAI.

[28]  Carri K Glide-Hurst,et al.  A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density. , 2007, Medical physics.

[29]  Laura Baglietto,et al.  Relationships between circulating hormone levels, mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  R. Rivlin,et al.  LARGE ELASTIC DEFORMATIONS OF ISOTROPIC MATERIALS. I. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS , 1997 .

[31]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[32]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. , 2008, Radiology.

[33]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  A Convergence Theorem for the Fuzzy ISODATA Clustering Algorithms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  Giske Ursin,et al.  Mammographic density - a useful biomarker for breast cancer risk in epidemiologic studies , 2009 .

[35]  J Dargahi,et al.  Hyperelastic modelling and parametric study of soft tissue embedded lump for MIS applications , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[36]  Hyungjun Park,et al.  B-spline curve fitting based on adaptive curve refinement using dominant points , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[37]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM) based algorithm for intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[38]  G Wang,et al.  ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[39]  D. Rypl,et al.  Triangulation of 3D surfaces reconstructed by interpolating subdivision , 2004 .

[40]  Opper,et al.  HERITABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY, A RISK FACTOR FOR BREAST CANCER , 2002 .

[41]  Abbas Samani,et al.  A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Jean-Daniel Boissonnat,et al.  From arteriographies to computational flow in saccular aneurisms: the INRIA experience , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[43]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. , 2004, Medical physics.

[44]  Helmut Pottmann,et al.  Fitting B-spline curves to point clouds by curvature-based squared distance minimization , 2006, TOGS.

[45]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[46]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[47]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[49]  R. S. Rivlin,et al.  Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. I. Fundamental concepts , 1948, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[50]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Methods for modeling and predicting mechanical deformations of the breast under external perturbations , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[51]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[52]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Triangular mesh generation employing a boundary expansion technique , 2006 .

[53]  K J Macura,et al.  The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[54]  Jonathan Richard Shewchuk,et al.  Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation , 2002, Comput. Geom..

[55]  C. Byrne,et al.  Invited commentary: assessing breast density change--lessons for future studies. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[56]  Michael Brady,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Standard Mammogram Form to Predict Breast Cancer Risk: Case-Control Study , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.