Scour influence on the fatigue life of operational monopile-supported offshore wind turbines

Offshore wind turbines supported on monopiles are an important source for renewable energy. Their fatigue life is governed by the environmental loads and in the dynamic behavior, depending on the support stiffness and thus soil-structure interaction. The effects of scour on the short-term and long-term responses of the NREL 5-MW wind turbine under operational conditions have been analyzed by using a finite element beam model with Winkler springs to model soil-structure interaction. It was found that due to scour, the modal properties of the wind turbine do not change significantly. However, the maximum bending moment in the monopile increases, leading to a significant reduction in fatigue life. Backfilling the scour hole can recover the fatigue life, depending mostly on the depth after backfilling. An approximate fatigue analysis method is proposed, based on the full time-domain analysis for 1 scour depth, predicting with good accuracy the fatigue life for different scour depths from the quasi-static changes in the bending moment.

[1]  Luke J. Prendergast,et al.  An investigation into the effect of scour on the natural frequency of an Offshore Wind Turbine , 2015 .

[2]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence , 1972 .

[3]  Luke J. Prendergast,et al.  An Investigation of the Changes in the Natural Frequency of a Pile affected by Scour , 2013 .

[4]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Mean load effects on the fatigue life of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations , 2013 .

[5]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Edge scour at scour protections around piles in the marine environment - Laboratory and field investigation , 2015 .

[6]  Ursula Smolka,et al.  Detecting critical scour developments at monopile foundations under operating conditions , 2015 .

[7]  Jiankang Sheng,et al.  Fatigue load simulation for foundation design of offshore wind turbines due to combined wind and wave loading , 2010, 2010 World Non-Grid-Connected Wind Power and Energy Conference.

[8]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Dynamic response sensitivity of an offshore wind turbine for varying subsoil conditions , 2015 .

[9]  J. Tempel,et al.  Design Methods for Offshore Wind Turbines at Exposed Sites , 2004 .

[10]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Cross-wind modal properties of offshore wind turbines identified by full scale testing , 2013 .

[11]  Ying Min Low.  Extending a time/frequency domain hybrid method for riser fatigue analysis , 2011 .

[12]  D. Zafirakis,et al.  The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history , 2011 .

[13]  M. B. Zaayer,et al.  Simplified fatigue assessment of offshore wind support structures accounting for variations in a farm , 2015 .

[14]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Numerical study of ice-induced loads and responses of a monopile-type offshore wind turbine in parked and operating conditions , 2016 .

[15]  Peter Frigaard,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Backfill in Scour Holes around Offshore Monopiles , 2010 .

[16]  Lance Manuel,et al.  Long-term loads for a monopile-supported offshore wind turbine , 2014 .

[17]  Tue Hald,et al.  Scour Assessment and Design for Scour for Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines , 2005 .

[18]  H. W. Shen,et al.  Local Scour Around Cylindrical Piers , 1977 .

[19]  S. John Hogan,et al.  Simplified critical mudline bending moment spectra of offshore wind turbine support structures , 2015 .

[20]  Sanjay R. Arwade,et al.  Sensitivity of the Dynamic Response of Monopile-Supported Offshore Wind Turbines to Structural and Foundation Damping , 2015 .

[21]  Min Zhang,et al.  A novel hybrid frequency-time domain method for the fatigue damage assessment of offshore structures , 2015 .

[22]  Vincenzo Nava,et al.  On the fatigue behavior of support structures for offshore wind turbines , 2014 .

[23]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[24]  Lucas I. Lago,et al.  Analysis of alternative adaptive geometrical configurations for the NREL-5 MW wind turbine blade , 2013 .

[25]  M. B. Zaaijer,et al.  Scour protection : a necessity or a waste of money ? , 2005 .

[26]  Søren Peder Hyldal Sørensen,et al.  Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour , 2013 .

[27]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Simplified Evaluation of Added Hydrodynamic Mass for Intake Towers , 1989 .

[28]  Yingning Qiu,et al.  Review of recent offshore wind power developments in china , 2013 .

[29]  J. A. Schneider,et al.  Engineering issues for fixed offshore wind turbines on Lake Michigan Mid Lake Plateau, USA , 2010 .

[30]  B. Sumer,et al.  Scour Around Vertical Pile in Waves , 1992 .

[31]  Sang Hoon Kim,et al.  Soil-structure interaction on the response of jacket-type offshore wind turbine , 2015 .

[32]  Yasser E. Mostafa.  Effect of Local and Global Scour on Lateral Response of Single Piles in Different Soil Conditions , 2012 .

[33]  John M. Harris,et al.  The nature of scour development and scour protection at offshore windfarm foundations. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[34]  Subrata K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Handbook of Offshore Engineering , 2005 .

[35]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Multi‐hazard reliability assessment of offshore wind turbines , 2015 .

[36]  Danny Van Hemelrijck,et al.  Fatigue assessment of offshore wind turbines on monopile foundations using multi‐band modal expansion , 2017 .

[37]  N. Troldborg,et al.  A simple atmospheric boundary layer model applied to large eddy simulations of wind turbine wakes , 2014 .

[38]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures , 2016 .

[39]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Time-Varying Dynamic Properties of Offshore Wind Turbines Evaluated by Modal Testing , 2013 .