Motor adaptation with passive machines: A first study on the effect of real and virtual stiffness

Motor adaptation to novel force fields is considered as a key mechanism not only for the understanding of skills learning in healthy subjects but also for rehabilitation of neurological subjects. Several studies conducted over the last two decades used active robotic manipulanda to generate force fields capable of perturbing the baseline trajectories of both healthy and impaired subjects. Recent studies showed how motor adaptation to novel force fields can be induced also via virtual environments, whereas the effects of the force are projected onto a virtual hand, while the real hand remains constrained within a channel. This has great potentials of being translated into passive devices, rather than robotic ones, with clear benefits in terms of costs and availability of the devices. However, passive devices and virtual environments have received much less attention at least with regard to motor adaptation. This paper investigates the effects of both the real and virtual stiffness on motor adaptation. In particular, we tested 20 healthy subjects under two different real stiffness conditions (Stiff Channel vs Compliant Channel) and two different virtual conditions (Viscous vs Springy). Our main finding is that compliance of the channel favours a better adaptation featured with less lateral errors and longer retention of the after-effect. We posit that the physical compliance of the channel induces a proprioceptive feedback which is otherwise absent in a stiff condition.

[1]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Brewer,et al.  Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[4]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Generalization of Object Manipulation Skills Learned without Limb Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[6]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation in isometric reaching is similar to movement adaptation , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[8]  Noriyuki Tejima,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: a review , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[9]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Composition and Decomposition of Internal Models in Motor Learning under Altered Kinematic and Dynamic Environments , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  V. Squeri,et al.  Proprioceptive assessment of the wrist joint across both joint degrees of freedom , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Learning Coriolis-Type of Force Fields without Robots , 2013 .

[14]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A Melendez-Calderon,et al.  Force Field Adaptation Can Be Learned Using Vision in the Absence of Proprioceptive Error , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Aymar de Rugy,et al.  The synergistic organization of muscle recruitment constrains visuomotor adaptation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.