Energy shaping plus damping injection control for a class of chemical reactors

Abstract Traditionally, stabilization of chemical reacting systems has been achieved with linear P or PD compensation schemes. Practical and numerical results have showed that classical linear compensation can yield acceptable performance. On the other hand, recent years have witnessed the emergence of systematic feedback control strategies based on energy and port-interconnected systems. These approaches exploit the physical structure of the chemical reactor to construct compensation schemes with physical appealing. The aim of this work is to show that traditional PD compensation for CSTRs can be interpreted in terms of mechanical system analogies. In the line of energy shaping plus damping injection for robotic systems, it is shown that proportional feedback is a type of potential energy shaping to accommodate a unique equilibrium point. On the other hand, derivative control acts as a damping injector for the energy balance within the chemical reactor. The stability proof uses a novel approach to convert the temperature dynamics into a second-order systems where the mechanical analogies become more evident. In this way, the stability analysis can be performed with singular perturbation methods with a Lyapunov function for the energy balance derived from a “potential plus kinetics” energy construction.

[1]  Rutherford Aris,et al.  An analysis of chemical reactor stability and control—IV.: Mixed derivative and proportional control , 1959 .

[2]  Jesus Alvarez,et al.  Nonlinear decoupling control of free-radical polymerization continuous stirred tank reactors , 1990 .

[3]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  A New Feedback Method for Dynamic Control of Manipulators , 1981 .

[4]  Min-Sen Chiu,et al.  Robust PID controller design for nonlinear processes using JITL technique , 2008 .

[5]  Fabrice Jadot,et al.  Global stabilization of exothermic chemical reactors under input constraints , 1997, Autom..

[6]  Denis Dochain,et al.  Power-shaping control of reaction systems: The CSTR case , 2010, Autom..

[7]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Putting energy back in control , 2001 .

[8]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  On the control of non-linear processes: An IDA–PBC approach , 2009 .

[9]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[10]  J. Kantor,et al.  AN EXOTHERMIC CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR IS FEEDBACK EQUIVALENT TO A LINEAR SYSTEM , 1985 .

[11]  Ricardo Femat,et al.  Robust PI stabilization of a class of chemical reactors , 1999 .

[12]  Masoud Soroush,et al.  Nonlinear control of a polymerization CSTR with singular characteristic matrix , 1994 .

[13]  Rafael Kelly,et al.  Regulation of manipulators in generic task space: an energy shaping plus damping injection approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  F. Hoppensteadt Asymptotic stability in singular perturbation problems. II: Problems having matched asymptotic expansion solutions☆ , 1974 .

[15]  Rutherford Aris,et al.  An analysis of chemical reactor stability and control—I: The possibility of local control, with perfect or imperfect control mechanisms , 1958 .

[16]  J. Álvarez-Ramírez Stability of a class of uncertain continuous stirred chemical reactors with a nonlinear feedback , 1994 .

[17]  Antonio A. Alonso,et al.  Process systems and passivity via the Clausius-Planck inequality , 1997 .

[18]  M. Feinberg Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors—I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems , 1987 .

[19]  Ralf Rothfuß,et al.  Flatness based control of a nonlinear chemical reactor model , 1996, Autom..

[20]  Alessandro Astolfi,et al.  Continuous stirred tank reactors: easy to stabilise? , 2003, Autom..