Can Lumbopelvic Parameters Be Used to Predict Thoracic Kyphosis at all Ages? A National Cross-Sectional Study.

[1]  S. Molloy,et al.  In Scheuermann’s kyphosis, a proximal UIV and postop kyphosis value close to patients’ PI decreases the risk of PJK , 2022, Spine Deformity.

[2]  E. Ferrero,et al.  Do Age-Related Variations Of Sagittal Alignment Rely On SpinoPelvic Organization? An Observational Study Of 1540 Subjects. , 2022, Global spine journal.

[3]  N. Heneghan,et al.  The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, and normative values across age groups: a systematic review of healthy adults , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[4]  V. Rampal,et al.  Surgical increase in thoracic kyphosis predicts increase of cervical lordosis after thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2021, European Spine Journal.

[5]  B. Ilharreborde,et al.  Proximal junctional kyphosis is a rebalancing spinal phenomenon due to insufficient postoperative thoracic kyphosis after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery , 2021, European Spine Journal.

[6]  J. Urrutia,et al.  Mid and lower thoracic kyphosis changes during adulthood: the influence of age, sex and thoracic coronal curvature , 2021, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[7]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Revisiting thoracic kyphosis: a normative description of the thoracic sagittal curve in an asymptomatic population , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[8]  V. Rampal,et al.  Lumbopelvic parameters can be used to predict thoracic kyphosis in adolescents , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[9]  G. Lv,et al.  Correlations between the inflection point and spinal sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[10]  V. Rampal,et al.  Patient-specific rods for thoracic kyphosis correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: Preliminary results. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[11]  V. Rampal,et al.  Surgical increase in thoracic kyphosis increases unfused lumbar lordosis in selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Pierre Roussouly,et al.  Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[13]  M. Yamagata,et al.  Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[14]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Following Segmental Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up , 2005, Spine.

[15]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position , 2005, Spine.

[16]  A. Alanay,et al.  The Evolution of Sagittal Segmental Alignment of the Spine During Childhood , 2005, Spine.

[17]  S. Koop,et al.  Determination of “Normal” Thoracic Kyphosis: A Roentgenographic Study of 121 “Normal” Children , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[18]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Reciprocal Angulation of Vertebral Bodies in the Sagittal Plane in an Asymptomatic Greek Population , 1998, Spine.

[19]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[20]  R. Jackson,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study , 1994, Spine.

[21]  G. Costanzo,et al.  Reciprocal Angulation of Vertebral Bodies in a Sagittal Plane: Approach to References for the Evaluation of Kyphosis and Lordosis , 1982, Spine.