A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods.

The traits of the pubis described by Phenice (Am J Phys Anthropol 30 (1969) 297-302) have been used extensively by physical anthropologist for sex estimation. This study investigates all three of Phenice's characteristics in an approach similar to Walker's (Am J Phys Anthropol 136 (2008) 39-50) study using observations from the cranium and mandible. The ventral arc, the subpubic contour, and the medial aspect of the ischio-pubic ramus were scored on a five-point ordinal scale from a sample of 310 adult, left innominates of known ancestry and sex from the Hamann-Todd Human Osteological Collection and the W.M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection. Four observers with varying levels of experience blindly scored each trait using new descriptions and illustrations adapted from those originally created by Phenice. The scores were then analyzed with ordinal logistic regression. Using all three traits for sex classification, the mean correct classification rate was 94.5% cross-validated for experienced observers. Intra- and interobserver error in trait scoring was low for all three traits and agreement levels ranged from moderate to substantial. Tests of the method on an independent validation sample provided a classification accuracy of 86.2%. This revision of the Phenice (Am J Phys Anthropol 30 (1969) 297-302) technique is a reliable and valid method of sex estimation from the human innominate that meets the Daubert criteria for court admissibility.

[1]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[2]  M. H. Day,et al.  Sexual differentiation in the innominate bone studied by multivariate analysis. , 1975, Annals of human biology.

[3]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  The accuracy of sex identification in European skeletal remains using the phenice characters. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  S. J. Press,et al.  Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis , 1978 .

[5]  Kenneth R. Foster,et al.  Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts , 1997 .

[6]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[7]  C. Y. Peng,et al.  Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting: A Primer , 2002 .

[8]  W. Bass Human osteology : a laboratory and field manual of the human skeleton , 1971 .

[9]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. , 2008, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  J V Taylor,et al.  Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  N. Lovell,et al.  Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  G. Letterman The greater sciatic notch in American Whites and negroes , 1941 .

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  M. Kelley,et al.  Phenice's visual sexing technique for the os pubis: a critique. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  Douglas H Ubelaker,et al.  A test of the phenice method for the estimation of sex. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  B. Anderson,et al.  Ventral arc of the os pubis: anatomical and developmental considerations. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  M Steyn,et al.  Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[19]  W. H. Coleman,et al.  Sex differences in the growth of the human bony pelvis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[21]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  Population variation in sexual dimorphism in the human innominate , 1986 .

[23]  Ann H Ross,et al.  A Geometric Morphometric Approach to Sex Determination of the Human Adult Os Coxa , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  J M Suchey,et al.  Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[26]  R. Melnick A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[27]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis , 1968 .

[28]  T. Wingate Todd,et al.  Age changes in the pubic bone , 1921 .

[29]  M. Lavelle,et al.  Natural selection and developmental sexual variation in the human pelvis. , 1995, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  J. Hefner,et al.  Cranial Nonmetric Variation and Estimating Ancestry * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[31]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[32]  D G McBride,et al.  Bootstrap methods for sex determination from the os coxae using the ID3 algorithm. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.