Exploring young students’ learning experiences with the iPad: a comparative study in Hong Kong international primary schools

Abstract In recent years, the popularity and capabilities of the iPad®, Apple’s tablet computer, have prompted educational technology advocates and policy makers to evaluate its potential in classrooms. However, there have been few studies examining the tangible user interface (TUI, in which the user manipulates the touchscreen of the device with their fingers), one of the most significant features of the iPad in comparison to previous mobile devices. Therefore, in this paper, the research team examined this interface specifically for its potential in terms of usability with input interaction for young learners. A case study was conducted at three international schools in Hong Kong to explore the impact of the iPad’s TUI on the student learning experience. A mixed-method approach was taken, and 13 observations and 10 interviews were conducted to collect data. With statistical analyses, the amount of students seeking learning support behavior (ASSLS) at the schools employing iPads was compared with that at the school using traditional laptops. Evidence emerged to support the assumption that the TUI on the iPad may contribute to reducing the ASSLS as well as enhancing student engagement and collaboration in class. Implications of the findings in terms of usability, engagement, interaction, practice, and future research are discussed.

[1]  Despina Galanouli,et al.  Students' perceptions of ICT-related support in teaching placements , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  David W. Johnson Cooperative Learning in the Classroom , 1994 .

[3]  B. Schneirdeman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[4]  Josef Hallberg,et al.  The development of personalised cognitive prosthetics , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  Signal Processing and Multimedia - International Conferences, SIP and MulGraB 2010, Held as Part of the Future Generation Information Technology Conference, FGIT 2010, Jeju Island, Korea, December 13-15, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, FGIT-SIP/MulGraB.

[6]  S. A. Becker,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition , 2015 .

[7]  Chris Stevens Designing for the iPad: Building Applications that Sell , 2011 .

[8]  Suzanne R. Painter,et al.  Issues in the Observation and Evaluation of Technology Integration in K-12 Classrooms , 2001 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[10]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[11]  Kwok-Wing Lai,et al.  Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Andries van Dam,et al.  Post-WIMP user interfaces , 1997, CACM.

[13]  Ian Walker,et al.  Touching the screen: issues related to the use of touchscreen technology in early childhood education , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[15]  Ken Schweller Apes with apps , 2012, IEEE Spectrum.

[16]  Nmc Horizon NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition (I) , 2013 .

[17]  Nopporn Chotikakamthorn,et al.  Using tangible user interfaces in computer-based training systems for low-functioning autistic children , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  J K JacobRobert A specification language for direct-manipulation user interfaces , 1986 .

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation , 1982 .

[21]  B. McClanahan,et al.  A Breakthrough for Josh: How Use of an iPad Facilitated Reading Improvement , 2012 .

[22]  Robert C. Meurant The iPad and EFL Digital Literacy , 2010, FGIT-SIP/MulGraB.

[23]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[24]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  A Specification Language for Direct-Manipulation User Interfaces , 1986, ACM Trans. Graph..

[25]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[26]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[27]  Welch Bl THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED , 1947 .

[28]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Towards demystification of direct manipulation: cognitive modeling charts the gulf of execution , 2001, CHI.

[29]  Mark Pegrum,et al.  Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools , 2013 .

[30]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[31]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .