Analysis of DNA Damage Response Gene Alterations and Tumor Mutational Burden Across 17,486 Tubular Gastrointestinal Carcinomas: Implications for Therapy.

BACKGROUND Alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway confer sensitivity to certain chemotherapies, radiation, and other DNA damage repair targeted therapies. BRCA1/2 are the most well-studied DDR genes, but recurrent alterations are described in other DDR pathway members across cancers. Deleterious DDR alterations may sensitize tumor cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition, but there are also increasing data suggesting that there may also be synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The relevance of DDR defects in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is understudied. We sought to characterize DDR-defective GI malignancies and to explore genomic context and tumor mutational burden (TMB) to provide a platform for future rational investigations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tumor samples from 17,486 unique patients with advanced colorectal, gastroesophageal, or small bowel carcinomas were assayed using hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling including sequencing of 10 predefined DDR genes: ARID1A, ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, PALB2, and RAD51. TMB (mutations per megabase [mut/Mb]) was calculated from up to 1.14 Mb of sequenced DNA. Clinicopathologic features were extracted and descriptive statistics were used to explore genomic relationships among identified subgroups. RESULTS DDR alterations were found in 17% of cases: gastric adenocarcinoma 475/1,750 (27%), small bowel adenocarcinoma 148/666 (22%), esophageal adenocarcinoma 467/2,501 (19%), and colorectal cancer 1,824/12,569 (15%). ARID1A (9.2%) and ATM (4.7%) were the most commonly altered DDR genes in this series, followed by BRCA2 (2.3%), BRCA1 (1.1%), CHEK2 (1.0%), ATR (0.8%), CDK12 (0.7%), PALB2 (0.6%), CHEK1 (0.1%) and RAD51 (0.1%). More than one DDR gene alteration was found in 24% of cases. High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and high TMB (TMB-H, ≥20 mut/Mb) were found in 19% and 21% of DDR-altered cases, respectively. Of DDR-altered/TMB-H cases, 87% were also MSI-H. However, even in the microsatellite stable (MSS)/DDR-wild-type (WT) versus MSS/DDR-altered, TMB-high was seen more frequently (0.4% vs. 3.3%, P < .00001.) Median TMB was 5.4 mut/Mb in the MSS/DDR-altered subset versus 3.8 mut/Mb in the MSS/DDR-WT subset (P ≤ .00001), and ATR alterations were enriched in the MSS/TMB-high cases. CONCLUSION This is the largest study to examine selected DDR defects in tubular GI cancers and confirms that DDR defects are relatively common and that there is an association between the selected DDR defects and a high TMB in more than 20% of cases. Microsatellite stable DDR-defective tumors with elevated TMB warrant further exploration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Deleterious DNA damage response (DDR) alterations may sensitize tumor cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition, but also potentially to immune checkpoint inhibitors, owing to accumulation of mutations in DDR-defective tumors. The relevance of DDR defects in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is understudied. This article characterizes DDR-defective GI malignancies and explores genomic context and tumor mutational burden to provide a platform for future rational investigations.

[1]  S. Badiyan,et al.  Immunotherapy and radiation therapy for gastrointestinal malignancies: hope or hype? , 2020, Translational gastroenterology and hepatology.

[2]  G. Cerqueira,et al.  Characterization of tumor mutation burden, PD-L1 and DNA repair genes to assess relationship to immune checkpoint inhibitors response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[3]  E. Vasile,et al.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Esophageal Cancers: Are We Finally Finding the Right Path in the Mist? , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma cancer harboring EGFR‐ANXA2, EGFR‐RAD51, ATR and BRCA2 mutations: A case report , 2019, Thoracic cancer.

[5]  K. Behbakht,et al.  Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer: Meeting report. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  M. Fakih,et al.  Lower tumor mutational burden (TMB) and hepatic metastases may predict for lack of response to PD-1 blockade in MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  L. Su,et al.  The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, Cancer management and research.

[8]  John L Marshall,et al.  Prevalence of Homologous Recombination-Related Gene Mutations Across Multiple Cancer Types. , 2018, JCO precision oncology.

[9]  Juanita Lopez,et al.  Dancing with the DNA damage response: next-generation anti-cancer therapeutic strategies , 2018, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[10]  A. Jeyasekharan,et al.  Biomarkers for Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cancer , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  A. Tan,et al.  TOPACIO/Keynote-162: Niraparib + pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a phase 2 trial. , 2018 .

[12]  E. Swisher,et al.  TOPACIO/Keynote-162 (NCT02657889): A phase 1/2 study of niraparib + pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced triple-negative breast cancer or recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC)—Results from ROC cohort. , 2018 .

[13]  G. Mills,et al.  ARID1A deficiency promotes mutability and potentiates therapeutic antitumor immunity unleashed by immune checkpoint blockade , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[14]  Michael T. Zimmermann,et al.  Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas , 2018, Cell reports.

[15]  K. Mouw,et al.  From checkpoint to checkpoint: DNA damage ATR/Chk1 checkpoint signalling elicits PD-L1 immune checkpoint activation , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  A. Maitra,et al.  Phase II study of olaparib for BRCAness phenotype in pancreatic cancer. , 2018 .

[17]  C. Iacobuzio-Donahue,et al.  Evaluating Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Recommendations , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Juanita Lopez,et al.  Combining DNA damaging therapeutics with immunotherapy: more haste, less speed , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  James X. Sun,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[20]  Masaya Suenaga,et al.  Deleterious Germline Mutations in Patients With Apparently Sporadic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Insertion-and-deletion-derived tumour-specific neoantigens and the immunogenic phenotype: a pan-cancer analysis. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade , 2017, Science.

[23]  Michael S. Goldberg,et al.  DNA Damage and Repair Biomarkers of Immunotherapy Response. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[24]  E. Kohn,et al.  Safety and Clinical Activity of the Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor Durvalumab in Combination With Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Olaparib or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Inhibitor Cediranib in Women's Cancers: A Dose-Escalation, Phase I Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Levi Garraway,et al.  Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden , 2017, Genome Medicine.

[26]  P. Meltzer,et al.  A phase II study of the anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibody durvalumab (D; MEDI4736) in combination with PARP inhibitor, olaparib (O), in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). , 2017 .

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  PARP Inhibitor Upregulates PD-L1 Expression and Enhances Cancer-Associated Immunosuppression , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  J. Sosman,et al.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma , 2017, Cell.

[29]  L. Zou,et al.  Functions, Regulation, and Therapeutic Implications of the ATR Checkpoint Pathway. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.

[30]  J. Cleland,et al.  Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure , 2016, Heart.

[31]  Ignace Vergote,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Yu Shyr,et al.  Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Markers of Response to PD-1 Blockade , 2016, Cancer Immunology Research.

[33]  Zhijian J. Chen,et al.  Regulation and function of the cGAS–STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing , 2016, Nature Immunology.

[34]  James X. Sun,et al.  Evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) status in 11,573 diverse solid tumors using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). , 2016 .

[35]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[36]  Jason Kaplan,et al.  Genomic landscape of DNA repair genes in cancer , 2016, Oncotarget.

[37]  Lauren L. Ritterhouse,et al.  Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer , 2016, Oncotarget.

[38]  J. Potash,et al.  Whole Genome Sequencing Defines the Genetic Heterogeneity of Familial Pancreatic Cancer. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[39]  Michael S. Goldberg,et al.  The PARP1 inhibitor BMN 673 exhibits immunoregulatory effects in a Brca1(-/-) murine model of ovarian cancer. , 2015, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[40]  P. Gimotty,et al.  CTLA-4 Blockade Synergizes Therapeutically with PARP Inhibition in BRCA1-Deficient Ovarian Cancer , 2015, Cancer Immunology Research.

[41]  A. Klein,et al.  Family history as a marker of platinum sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2015, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[42]  J. Kench,et al.  Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer , 2015, Nature.

[43]  R. Gershoni-baruch,et al.  Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[44]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  Patrick J O'Connor,et al.  Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. , 2013, JAMA.

[46]  Nicola J. Curtin,et al.  DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[47]  Yuchen Jiao,et al.  ATM mutations in patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[48]  J. Hoeijmakers Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.