Summary This article takes complex emergencies and the humanitarian response to them as its point of reference. It provides a critique of relief, development and the linking debate. Rather than being autonomous, relief is a developmental idea. However, development concepts have proven incapable of explaining permanent emergency. They also underestimate the extent of the North's institutional accommodation with unresolved political crisis in the South. Beginning with non‐mandated NGO operations, there has been a growing acknowledgement of the inevitability of working in conflict situations. Moreover, accompanying the growth in emergency spending, the number of options available to donors has increased. Aid is now integrated with the dynamics of violence to an unprecedented extent. Greater donor flexibility in the face of systemic crisis has also contributed to a weakening of the principle of collective responsibility in the North. A new political consensus and innovative ways of working with protracted crisis are required to tackle the problem of complex emergencies. Resume Les etats d'urgence complexes et la crise du developpementalisme Comme point de reference, le present article adopte les etats d'urgence complexes et la reponse humanitaire qui en decoule; l'article presente une critique de l'aide d'urgence, du developpement, et du debat concernant les liens entre ces urgences et les reponses y apportees. Loin d'etre autonome, l'idee meme de l'aide d'urgence appartient au domaine developpemental. Toutefois, les concepts issus du developpement se sont reveles incapables d'expliquer la permanence de ces urgences. Par ailleurs ces concepts sous‐estiment l'etendue des compromis des institutions dans le Nord vis‐a‐vis des crises politiques non resolue dans les pays du Sud. Commencant par les operations sans mandat des ONG, l'on reconnait la necessite de plus en plus ineluctable de travailler dans des situations de conflit. Qui plus est, et en parallele avec le cout croissant de ces etats d'urgence, les options a la disposition des donateurs augmentent en parallele avec le cout croisssant de ces etats d'urgence. Dans un degre sans precedent, l'aide s'integre dans la dynamique de la violence. De meme, la plus grande souplesse dont jouissent les pays donateurs face a la crise dans le systeme, aurait contribue a l'affaiblissement du principe de la responsabilite collective dans le Nord. Afin de pouvoir commencer a solutionner le probleme des etats d'urgence complexes, un nouveau consensus politique et de nouvelles approches aux crises prolongees s'imposent. Resumen Emergencias complejas y la crisis del desarrollismo Este articulo toma como punto de referencia las emergencias complejas y la respuesta humanitaria que estas reciben. Provee una critica al debate sobre la integracion de asistencia y desarrollo. La asistencia es una idea mas bien desarrollista que autonoma. Sin embargo, los conceptos desarrollistas no han sido capaces de explicar situaciones de emergencia permanente. Tambien subestiman el nivel de aceptacion institucional del Norte con respecto a las crisis politicas sin resolver del Sur. Comenzando por las operaciones no gubernamentales (NGO), ha habido un creciente reconocimiento de que el trabajo debe realizarse, inevitablemente en muchos casos, en situaciones de conflicto. Ademas, junto al aumento de los gastos de emergencia, aumenta el numero de opciones disponibles para los donantes. La ayuda se ve integrada dentro de la dinamica de la violencia hasta un grado nunca visto antes. La mayor flexibilidad de los donantes frente a una crisis sistemica ha contribuido tambien a debilitar el principio de responsabilidad colectiva en el Norte. En conclusion: para enfrentar el problema de las emergencias complejas, se requiere un nuevo consenso politico y formas innovativas de trabajar dentro de situaciones de crisis prolongada.
[1]
M. Duffield.
War and famine in Africa
,
1991
.
[2]
D. Keen.
The Benefits of Famine: A Political Economy of Famine and Relief in Southwestern Sudan, 1983-1989
,
1995
.
[3]
L. Minear.
Humanitarianism Under Siege: A Critical Review of Operation Lifeline Sudan
,
1990
.
[4]
R. Higgins.
The new United Nations and former Yugoslavia
,
1993
.
[5]
Beverly G. Hawk.
Free at Last? U. S. Policy toward Africa and the End of the Cold War@@@The Political Economy of Third World Intervention: Mines, Money, and U. S. Policy in the Congo Crisis@@@U. S. Economic Policy toward Africa@@@Assassination in Khartoum
,
1992,
The Journal of Modern African Studies.
[6]
David Welsh,et al.
Domestic politics and ethnic conflict
,
1993
.
[7]
S. Sideri.
Restructuring the Post‐Cold War World Economy: Perspectives and a Prognosis
,
1993
.
[8]
A. Roberts.
Humanitarian war: military intervention and human rights
,
1993,
The United Nations.
[9]
D. Korten.
Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda
,
1990
.
[10]
John Borton,et al.
Recent trends in the international relief system.
,
1993,
Disasters.
[11]
Randolph C Kent,et al.
The Anatomy of Disaster Relief: The International Network in Action
,
1987
.
[12]
R. Norgaard.
Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future.
,
1994
.
[13]
D. Keen.
Refugees: Rationing the Right to Life the Crisis in Emergency Relief
,
1992
.
[14]
K. Griffin.
Foreign Aid after the Cold War
,
1991
.
[15]
M. Goulding.
The evolution of United Nations peacekeeping
,
1993,
The United Nations.
[16]
C. Oman.
Globalisation and regionalisation : the challenge for developing countries
,
1994
.
[17]
G. Myrdal.
Economic theory and underdeveloped regions
,
1965
.
[18]
J. Ross,et al.
Linking relief and development
,
1994
.