The Heidelberg retina tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score: reproducibility and measurement of progression.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nicholas G Strouthidis | Ryo Asaoka | Shaban Demirel | David F Garway-Heath | R. Asaoka | D. Garway-Heath | N. Strouthidis | S. Demirel | Claudio Cossio-Zuniga | Claudio Cossio-Zuniga
[1] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Comparison of HRT-3 glaucoma probability score and subjective stereophotograph assessment for prediction of progression in glaucoma. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[2] D. Garway-Heath. Early diagnosis in glaucoma. , 2008, Progress in brain research.
[3] S. Gardiner,et al. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[4] Robert N Weinreb,et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[5] G. Wollstein,et al. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.
[6] R. Ritch,et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[7] G. Wollstein,et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.
[8] D. Friedman,et al. How should results from clinical tests be integrated into the diagnostic process? , 2006, Ophthalmology.
[9] B. Chauhan,et al. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
[10] A. Beckett,et al. AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.
[11] D. Garway-Heath,et al. Improving the repeatability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II rim area measurements , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[12] G. Wollstein,et al. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3. , 2007, Ophthalmology.
[13] David Garway-Heath,et al. Results of the betaxolol versus placebo treatment trial in ocular hypertension , 2003, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[14] D. Garway-Heath,et al. Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[15] Nicholas G Strouthidis,et al. Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[16] A. Ferreras,et al. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. , 2007, Ophthalmology.
[17] A Heijl,et al. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.
[18] L. Rossetti,et al. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.
[19] L. Sakata,et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.
[20] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.
[21] A C Viswanathan,et al. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[22] P. Artes,et al. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[23] N. Swindale,et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.