The Role of Testing in Elementary Schools.

The goal of this study was to understand the role that external testing plays in elementary schools. Focus was on uncovering teachers' beliefs about testing and preparing students to take tests, how these beliefs and values are organized, and what implications they might have on practice. To accomplish this, the day-to-day life in classrooms and how tests and results come into play were studied. The dual case study design provided an interpretive contrast for two schools from the Phoenix (Arizona) area. Schools used the same external tests (the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Basic Skills Test, Continuous Uniform Evaluation System, and Study Skills Test). Although the schools had many similarities, including that of population, one had a program-centered, phonics-based curricular context, and the other had a student-centered, literature-based approach. Observations of 29 classrooms, interviews with 19 teachers, and more extensive observations of 6 focal classrooms made the analysis of beliefs about testing possible and allowed the description of activities related to testing at the two schools, including test preparation and coaching. Study findings are grouped into: (1) local definitions of testing; (2) the role of testing; and (3) the effects of testing. It is held that to define the role of testing as simply psychometric is to oversimplify it, but it is the psychometric weaknesses of tests that make them useful weapons in skirmishes among interest groups. It is argued that no test score ever improves schools. The changes brought about because of test scores are short-term and largely symbo Seven exhibits, one figure, and one table are provided. A 70-m list of references is included. Two appendices summarize a sul !y of Arizona educators and discuss disappointing test scores. (SLD)

[1]  Grant Mccracken The long interview , 1988 .

[2]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change* , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[3]  Karl R. White,et al.  Teaching Test-Taking Skills to Elementary-Grade Students: A Meta-Analysis , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  The Psychiatric Interview , 1955 .

[5]  R. Linn Comparing State and District Test Results to National Norms: Interpretations of Scoring "Above the National Average.". , 1990 .

[6]  R. Berk Fifty reasons why student achievement gain does not mean teacher effectiveness , 1988 .

[7]  D. Polkinghorne Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences , 2010 .

[8]  L. Shepard,et al.  Kindergarten Readiness and Retention: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices , 1988 .

[9]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing. , 1991 .

[10]  Robert E. Floden,et al.  The Cultures of Teaching. Occasional Paper No. 74. , 1984 .

[11]  Susy Macqueen,et al.  Validity , 1973, Just Algorithms.

[12]  Gordon E. Samson,et al.  Effects of Training in Test-Taking Skills on Achievement Test Performance: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1985 .

[13]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform , 1992 .

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[15]  George W. Mayeske A Study of the Achievement of our Nation's Students. , 1973 .

[16]  Peter W. Airasian,et al.  LINKING TESTING AND INSTRUCTION: POLICY ISSUES , 1983 .

[17]  R. Glaser Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[18]  Martin Rein,et al.  Social Science And Public Policy , 1976 .

[19]  E. Mishler Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative , 1986 .

[20]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[21]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative analysis for social scientists: References , 1987 .

[22]  P. Ginsberg,et al.  The dysfunctional side effects of quantitative indicator production: illustration from mental health care (a message from Chicken Little). , 1984, Evaluation and program planning.

[23]  G. Halpin,et al.  Coaching Effects on California Achievement Test Scores in Elementary Grades. , 1987 .

[24]  Murray Edelman,et al.  The symbolic uses of politics , 1967 .

[25]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[26]  Peter W. Airasian,et al.  The effects of standardized testing , 1982 .

[27]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  On the Differences Between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research , 1981 .

[28]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[29]  S. Ball The micro-politics of the school , 1987 .

[30]  John J. Cannell,et al.  Nationally Normed Elementary Achievement Testing in America's Public Schools: How All 50 States Are Above the National Average , 1988 .

[31]  Joan L. Herman,et al.  Assessing Student Achievement: A Profile of Classroom Practices. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation 11. , 1986 .

[32]  G. Glass Using Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers , 1990 .

[33]  R. Gold Roles in Sociological Field Observations , 1958 .

[34]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Beyond Standardization: State Standards and School Improvement , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[35]  G. Glass,et al.  Standards of Competence: A Multi-Site Case Study of School Reform. Project: Effects of Testing Reforms and Standards. , 1987 .

[36]  W. James Popham,et al.  The Merits of Measurement-Driven Instruction. , 1987 .