Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: An Individual Patient-Level Analysis of Multiple Randomized Trials (SEAL).

Purpose Overall survival (OS) is the definitive and best-established primary efficacy end point to evaluate diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) therapies, but it requires prolonged follow-up. An earlier end point assessed post-treatment would expedite clinical trial conduct and accelerate patient access to effective new therapies. Our objective was to formally evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS at 24 months (PFS24) as surrogate end points for OS in first-line DLBCL. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were analyzed from 7,507 patients from 13 multicenter randomized controlled trials of active treatment in previously untreated DLBCL, published after 2002, with sufficient PFS data to predict treatment effects on OS. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of PFS/PFS24 and OS was evaluated using both linear regression ( R2WLS) and Copula bivariable ( R2Copula) models. Prespecified criteria for surrogacy required either R2WLS or R2Copula ≥ 0.80 and neither < 0.7, with lower-bound 95% CI > 0.60. Results Trial-level surrogacy for PFS was strong ( R2WLS = 0.83; R2Copula = 0.85) and met the predefined criteria for surrogacy. At the patient level, PFS strongly correlated with OS. The surrogate threshold effect had a hazard ratio of 0.89. Surrogacy was consistent across comparisons with or without rituximab and with rituximab maintenance trials. Trial-level surrogacy for PFS24 was relatively strong ( R2WLS = 0.77; R2Copula = 0.78) but did not meet prespecified criteria. At the patient level, PFS24 significantly correlated with OS. The surrogate threshold effect had an odds ratio of 1.51. Conclusion This large pooled analysis of individual patient data supports PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in future randomized controlled trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy in DLBCL. Use of this end point may expedite therapeutic development with the intent of bringing novel therapies to this patient population years before OS results are mature.

[1]  C. Flowers,et al.  Exploring the potential cost-effectiveness of precision medicine treatment strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2018, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[2]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. , 2017, Blood.

[3]  D. Dunson,et al.  Genetic and Functional Drivers of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma , 2017, Cell.

[4]  A. Mariotto,et al.  Cancer‐specific mortality, cure fraction, and noncancer causes of death among diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients in the immunochemotherapy era , 2017, Cancer.

[5]  N. Schmitz,et al.  The Search for Surrogate Endpoints in Trials in Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: The Surrogate Endpoints for Aggressive Lymphoma Project , 2017, The oncologist.

[6]  J. Burke,et al.  Obinutuzumab or Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  A. Rosenwald,et al.  Clinical Impact of the Cell-of-Origin Classification and the MYC/ BCL2 Dual Expresser Status in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated Within Prospective Clinical Trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D. Lu,et al.  Assessment of Correlation Between Early and Late Efficacy Endpoints to Identify Potential Surrogacy Relationships in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Literature-Based Meta-analysis of 108 Phase II and Phase III Studies , 2017, The AAPS Journal.

[9]  E. Kimby,et al.  Thirty-Month Complete Response as a Surrogate End Point in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma Therapy: An Individual Patient-Level Analysis of Multiple Randomized Trials. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  G. Salles,et al.  Polatuzumab Vedotin Combined with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (R-CHP) for Patients with Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Updated Results of a Phase Ib/II Study , 2016 .

[11]  Scott E. Smith,et al.  Phase III Randomized Study of R-CHOP Versus DA-EPOCH-R and Molecular Analysis of Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: CALGB/Alliance 50303 , 2016 .

[12]  J. Cerhan,et al.  2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  R. Advani,et al.  The World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms , 2013 .

[14]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  ROBUST: Lenalidomide-R-CHOP versus placebo-R-CHOP in previously untreated ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2016, Future oncology.

[15]  Eugene Zhu,et al.  Frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) for non-GCB DLBCL. , 2015, Blood.

[16]  R. Greil,et al.  Rituximab maintenance for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma in first remission: results of the randomized NHL13 trial , 2015, Haematologica.

[17]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunoglobulin high-throughput sequencing. , 2015, Blood.

[18]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Lenalidomide combined with R-CHOP overcomes negative prognostic impact of non-germinal center B-cell phenotype in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma: a phase II study. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: optimizing outcome in the context of clinical and biologic heterogeneity. , 2015, Blood.

[20]  Scott E. Smith,et al.  Impact of induction regimen and stem cell transplantation on outcomes in double-hit lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis. , 2014, Blood.

[21]  L. Sehn,et al.  R-CHOP with or without bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final MAIN study outcomes , 2014, Haematologica.

[22]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Event-free survival at 24 months is a robust end point for disease-related outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Kai Fu,et al.  Determining cell-of-origin subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using gene expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. , 2014, Blood.

[24]  J. Singer,et al.  Comparison of pixantrone-based regimen (CPOP-R) with doxorubicin-based therapy (CHOP-R) for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  David Cunningham,et al.  Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 comparison of dose intensification with 14-day versus 21-day cycles , 2013, The Lancet.

[26]  A. Rosenwald,et al.  Conventional chemotherapy (CHOEP-14) with rituximab or high-dose chemotherapy (MegaCHOEP) with rituximab for young, high-risk patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (DSHNHL 2002-1). , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  P. Mazza,et al.  Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab versus epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisone and rituximab for the initial treatment of elderly “fit” patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the ANZINTER3 trial of the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi , 2012, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[28]  T. Molina,et al.  Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[29]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: 6-year results of an open-label randomised study of the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  M. Crump,et al.  Identification of potential surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials of aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: correlation of complete response, time-to-event and overall survival end points , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  B. Coiffier,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. , 2010, Blood.

[32]  B. Coiffier,et al.  Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Pooled safety and efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in nine first-line treatment trials using individual data from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  L. Staudt,et al.  LMO2 Expression And The Hans Algorithm In Predicting Germinal Center Phenotype And Survival In Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab , 2009 .

[35]  Markus Loeffler,et al.  Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[36]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  End points for colon cancer adjuvant trials: observations and recommendations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients enrolled onto 18 randomized trials from the ACCENT Group. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Marc Buyse,et al.  Surrogate threshold effect: an alternative measure for meta‐analytic surrogate endpoint validation , 2006, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[38]  Randy D Gascoyne,et al.  Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[40]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[41]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  The validation of surrogate end points by using data from randomized clinical trials: a case‐study in advanced colorectal cancer , 2004 .

[43]  L. Staudt,et al.  Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. , 2004, Blood.

[44]  Pierre Morel,et al.  CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Meland,et al.  The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Validation of surrogate end points in multiple randomized clinical trials with failure time end points , 2001 .

[47]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling , 2000, Nature.

[48]  D. Weisenburger,et al.  New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  T M Grogan,et al.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.