Elicitation and prioritization of requirements for electronic health records for oncology in low resource settings: A concept mapping study

BACKGROUND Understanding functional and non-functional requirements is essential to successfully implement electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Actual requirements will be different for different contexts. OBJECTIVE To elicit and prioritize requirements for implementing EMRs in oncology in low and middle income countries (LMICs), and to relate these to requirements from high-income countries. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Cancer care stakeholders including oncologists, general doctors, nurses, biostatisticians, information technologists, from different LMICs, were involved. METHODS Concept mapping was used. Statements of requirements were obtained during focus group discussions (FGDs) and interviews. Using surveys, the requirements were clustered and ranked on importance and feasibility. Data were analyzed in SPSS using agglomerative hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling, to create cluster maps and go-zone maps reflecting the relationships between the requirements and their prioritization. RESULTS Four FGD sessions, with twenty participants, were conducted. In addition, six participants were interviewed. Twenty-two participants clustered the requirements and sixty-three participants ranked them on importance and feasibility. One hundred and sixty requirement statements were generated which were reduced to sixty-four after de-duplication and merging. Nine clusters were obtained encompassing the following domains, in order of importance: Security, Conducive organization, Management/Governance, General EMR functionalities, Computer infrastructure, Data management, Usability, Oncology decision support, and Ancillary requirements. On ranking, the requirements scored between 3.74 and 4.80 on importance, and between 3.55 and 4.46 on feasibility, on a 5-point Likert scale. We generated concept maps for use when communicating with stakeholders. CONCLUSION For oncology EMRs in LMICs, requirements overlap those from high-income countries, but generic EMR functionalities, Infrastructural and organizational requirements are still considered priority in LMICs compared to oncology-specific requirements or advanced EMR features e.g. computerized decision support or interoperability. Concept mapping is a fast and cost-effective method for eliciting and prioritizing EMR requirements in a user-centered manner.

[1]  Luis Villa,et al.  A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Brian Gannon,et al.  An analysis of electronic document management in oncology care , 2012, Health Informatics J..

[3]  Karl E. Wiegers,et al.  Software Requirements , 1999 .

[4]  Astrid M. van Ginneken,et al.  The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[6]  Terence Tang,et al.  Clinician user involvement in the real world: Designing an electronic tool to improve interprofessional communication and collaboration in a hospital setting , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  B. Rosen,et al.  AMPATH-Oncology: A model for comprehensive cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa , 2013 .

[8]  J. Blaya,et al.  E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. , 2010, Health affairs.

[9]  Klaas Sikkel,et al.  Agile requirements prioritization in large-scale outsourced system projects: An empirical study , 2013, J. Syst. Softw..

[10]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Improving modern cancer care through information technology. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  John C. Mayan,et al.  Health Informatics in Developing Countries: Going beyond Pilot Practices to Sustainable Implementations: A Review of the Current Challenges , 2014, Healthcare informatics research.

[12]  H. V. van Oers,et al.  Towards local implementation of Dutch health policy guidelines: a concept-mapping approach , 2017, Health promotion international.

[13]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Context of Use within usability activities , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  T. Sherertz,et al.  Global health from a cancer care perspective. , 2015, Future oncology.

[15]  Suzanne Austin Boren,et al.  The role of the electronic medical record (EMR) in care delivery development in developing countries: a systematic review. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[16]  Johnblack K. Kabukye,et al.  Towards an Open-Source Oncology Electronic Medical Records System for Low-Resource Settings: Development of Chemotherapy Management in OpenMRS , 2019, MedInfo.

[17]  Sanjay Misra,et al.  A Requirements Engineering Techniques Review in Agile Software Development Methods , 2017, ICCSA.

[18]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[19]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Eliciting end-user expectations to guide the implementation process of a new electronic health record: A case study using concept mapping , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  A. Binagwaho,et al.  Implementation Science for Global Oncology: The Imperative to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cancer Care Delivery. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Mary Kane,et al.  Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation , 2006 .

[22]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Redefining global health priorities: Improving cancer care in developing settings , 2014, Journal of global health.

[23]  L. Shulman,et al.  Pursuing equity in cancer care: implementation, challenges and preliminary findings of a public cancer referral center in rural Rwanda , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[24]  Kim M. Unertl,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Crossing the Implementation Chasm: A Proposal for Bold Action , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Jeremy Warner,et al.  Where is the EHR in oncology? , 2012, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[26]  C J Seebregts,et al.  Human Factors for Capacity Building. Lessons learned from the OpenMRS Implementers Network , 2010, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[27]  Sharon S. Choi,et al.  Implementing electronic medical record systems in developing countries. , 2005, Informatics in primary care.

[28]  Maria Lucia Specchia,et al.  The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, European journal of public health.

[29]  Janita F. J. Vos,et al.  Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  Jeremy Warner,et al.  Electronic health records (EHRs): supporting ASCO's vision of cancer care. , 2014, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[31]  Manisha Mantri,et al.  Electronic Health Record: Standards, Coding Systems, Frameworks, and Infrastructures , 2012 .

[32]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[33]  Peter Paul Yu,et al.  The Evolution of Oncology Electronic Health Records , 2011, Cancer journal.

[34]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  The state of user-centered design practice , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  Christina Synowiec,et al.  E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. , 2012, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[36]  K. Elsaid,et al.  Chemotherapy e-prescribing: opportunities and challenges , 2015, Integrated pharmacy research & practice.

[37]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Agile requirements engineering practices and challenges: an empirical study , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[39]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.