In gas wells, decreased/unstable production can occur due to difficult-to-predict dynamic effects resulted from late-life phenomena, such as liquid loading and flooding. To minimize the negative impact of these effects, maximize production and extend the wells’ lifetime, wells are often operated in an intermittent production regime. The goal of this work is to find the optimum production and shut-in cycles to maximize intermittent gas production as a decision support to operators.
A framework suitable for single and multiple wells was developed by coupling a Deep Learning forward model trained on historical data with a population-based global optimizer, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The forward model predicts the production rates and wellhead pressure during production and shut-in conditions, respectively. The PSO algorithm optimizes the operational criteria given operational and environmental objectives, such as maximizing production, minimizing start-up/shut-in actions, penalizing emissions under several constraints such as planned maintenances and meeting a contract production value.
The accuracy of the Deep Learning models was tested on synthetic and field data. On synthetic data, mature wells were tested under different reservoir conditions such as initial water saturation, permeability and flow regimes. The relative errors in the predicted total cumulative production ranged between 0.5 and 4.6% for synthetic data and 0.9% for field data. The mean errors for pressure prediction were of 2-3 bar. The optimization framework was benchmarked for production optimization and contract value matching for a single-well (on field data) and a cluster of wells (synthetic data). Single-well production optimization of a North Sea well achieved a 3% production increase, including planned maintenances. Production optimization for six wells resulted in a 21% production increase for a horizon of 30 days, while contract value matching yielded 29/30 values within 3% of the target. The most optimum, repeatable and computationally efficient results were obtained using critical pressure/gas flowrates as operational criteria. This could enable real-time gas production optimization and operational decision-making in a wide range of well conditions and operational requirements.
[1]
Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.
Long Short-Term Memory
,
1997,
Neural Computation.
[2]
Sigurd Skogestad,et al.
Real-Time Optimization under Uncertainty Applied to a Gas Lifted Well Network
,
2016
.
[3]
Chia-Feng Juang,et al.
A hybrid of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for recurrent network design
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).
[4]
Pejman Shoeibi Omrani,et al.
Deep Learning and Data Assimilation for Real-Time Production Prediction in Natural Gas Wells
,
2018,
ArXiv.
[5]
Pejman Shoeibi Omrani,et al.
An Automated Diagnostic Analytics Workflow for the Detection of Production Events - Application to Mature Gas Fields
,
2020
.
[6]
Bjarne Foss,et al.
A two-layer structure for stabilization and optimization of an oil gathering network
,
2016
.
[7]
Bjarne Grimstad,et al.
Petroleum production optimization - A static or dynamic problem?
,
2017,
Comput. Chem. Eng..
[8]
Henry V. Nickens,et al.
Gas Well Deliquification
,
2003
.
[9]
Riccardo Poli,et al.
Particle swarm optimization
,
1995,
Swarm Intelligence.
[10]
Kurt Hornik,et al.
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
,
1989,
Neural Networks.
[11]
Iulian Dobrovolschi,et al.
Improving the Accuracy of Virtual Flow Metering and Back-Allocation through Machine Learning
,
2018
.
[12]
Guido Rossum,et al.
Python Reference Manual
,
2000
.