The effect of salpingectomy on the ovarian reserve and ovarian response in ectopic pregnancy

Abstract Background: Salpingectomy is routinely performed in ectopic pregnancy (EP). However, the effect of the surgery on the ovarian reserve and ovarian response in EP patients is still uncertain and has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to provide a comparison of the ovarian reserve and ovarian response between the pre-salpingectomy and post-salpingectomy in EP patients. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant articles published up to December 2018. We retrieved the basic information and data of the included studies. The data was analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Results: A total of 243 articles were extracted from the databases, and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The ovarian reserve including anti-Mullerian hormone (inverse variance [IV] −0.7 [95% confidence interval [CI] −0.63, 0.49]), antral follicle count (IV 1.7 [95% CI −2.02, 5.42]) and basal follicle stimulating hormone (IV 0.02 [95% CI −0.63, 0.68]) was comparable between the pre-salpingectomy group and the post-salpingectomy group. The amount of gonadotropin was significantly higher in the post-salpingectomy group when compared with that in the pre-salpingectomy group (IV −212.65 [95% CI −383.59, −41.71]). There was no significant difference in the left parameters of the ovarian response including the duration of gonadotropin stimulation (IV −0.32 [95% CI −0.76, 0.12]), the estrogen level on the human chorionic gonadotropin triggering day (IV −4.12 [95% CI −236.27, −228.04]) and the number of retrieved oocytes (IV 0.35 [95% CI −0.76, 1.46]) between 2 groups. Conclusions: The current results suggest that salpingectomy has no negative effect on the ovarian reserve and ovarian response.

[1]  J. Salemi,et al.  National rates, trends and determinants of inpatient surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy in the United States, 1998–2011 , 2018, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[2]  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Ovarian Response and in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes After Salpingectomy: Does Salpingectomy Indication Matter? , 2017, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[4]  E. Taylan,et al.  The impact of salpingectomy and single-dose systemic methotrexate treatments on ovarian reserve in ectopic pregnancy. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  F. Zullo,et al.  Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Effect of Methotrexate or Salpingectomy for Ectopic Pregnancy on Subsequent In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer Outcomes. , 2015, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[7]  Yue-zhou Yang,et al.  A retrospective analysis of the effect of salpingectomy on serum antiMüllerian hormone level and ovarian reserve. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  E. Carey,et al.  Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Anti‐Müllerian hormone levels in salpingectomized compared with nonsalpingectomized women with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[10]  R. Nahum,et al.  Effects of treatment of ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate or salpingectomy in the subsequent IVF cycle. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  F. Gong,et al.  Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy , 2012, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[12]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Anti Mullerian Hormone Serum Levels and Reproductive Outcome Are Not Affected by Neither Methotrexate Nor Laparoscopic Salpingectomy for the Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy in IVF Patients , 2011 .

[13]  M. Sezik,et al.  Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: Effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow , 2007, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[14]  L. Nardo,et al.  Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  C. Farquhar Ectopic pregnancy , 2005, The Lancet.

[16]  G. Ohel,et al.  Ovarian Response to Gonadotropin Stimulation in Repeated IVF Cycles After Unilateral Salpingectomy , 2002, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[17]  P. Ho,et al.  Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  W. Schoolcraft,et al.  Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: salpingectomy versus proximal tubal occlusion. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  I. Bukovsky,et al.  Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[21]  G. Trew,et al.  Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.