ApiNATOMY: A novel toolkit for visualizing multiscale anatomy schematics with phenotype‐related information

A significant proportion of biomedical resources carries information that cross references to anatomical structures across multiple scales. To improve the visualization of such resources in their anatomical context, we developed an automated methodology that produces anatomy schematics in a consistent manner, and provides for the overlay of anatomy‐related resource information onto the same diagram. This methodology, called ApiNATOMY, draws upon the topology of ontology graphs to automatically lay out treemaps representing body parts as well as semantic metadata linking to such ontologies. More generally, ApiNATOMY treemaps provide an efficient and manageable way to visualize large biomedical ontologies in a meaningful and consistent manner. In the anatomy domain, such treemaps will allow epidemiologists, clinicians, and biomedical scientists to review, and interact with, anatomically aggregated heterogenous data and model resources. Such an approach supports the visual identification of functional relations between anatomically colocalized resources that may not be immediately amenable to automation by ontology‐based inferencing. We also describe the application of ApiNATOMY schematics to integrate, and add value to, human phenotype‐related information—results are found at http://apinatomy.org. The long‐term goal for the ApiNATOMY toolkit is to support clinical and scientific graphical user interfaces and dashboards for biomedical resource management and data analytics. Hum Mutat 33:837–848, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Entity/quality-based logical definitions for the human skeletal phenome using PATO , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Squarified Treemaps , 2000, VisSym.

[3]  Michael Gruenberger,et al.  Anatomy ontologies and potential users: bridging the gap , 2011, J. Biomed. Semant..

[4]  Raymond Y. N. Lee,et al.  Building a Cell and Anatomy Ontology of Caenorhabditis Elegans , 2003, Comparative and functional genomics.

[5]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Sarala M. Wimalaratne,et al.  The RICORDO approach to semantic interoperability for biomedical data and models: strategy, standards and solutions , 2011, BMC Research Notes.

[7]  Erik Segerdell,et al.  An ontology for Xenopus anatomy and development , 2008, BMC Developmental Biology.

[8]  M. Ashburner,et al.  An ontology for cell types , 2005, Genome Biology.

[9]  Hilmar Lapp,et al.  The Teleost Anatomy Ontology: Anatomical Representation for the Genomics Age , 2010, Systematic biology.

[10]  Thomas Bittner,et al.  A Theory of Granular Partitions , 2003, Foundations of Geographic Information Science.

[11]  Jonathan B L Bard,et al.  Anatomics: the intersection of anatomy and bioinformatics , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Ibrahim Emam,et al.  Gene Expression Atlas at the European Bioinformatics Institute , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  S. Mundlos,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology , 2010, Clinical genetics.

[15]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  NCBO Resource Index: Ontology-based search and mining of biomedical resources , 2010, J. Web Semant..