The Effect of the Atrial Pacing Site on the Total Atrial Activation Time

ROITHINGER, F.X., et al.: The Effect of the Atrial Pacing Site on the Total Atrial Activation Time. The effect of dual site pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation may be due to synchronization of right and left atrial activation. Little is known, however, about the effect of pacing from single right atrial sites on differences in interatrial conduction. Twenty‐eight patients without structural heart disease were studied following radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias. Pacing was performed using standard multipolar catheters from the presumed insertion site of Bachmann's bundle, the coronary sinus ostium, the high lateral right atrium, and the right atrial appendage (n = 8 patients). Bipolar recording was performed from the distal coronary sinus, the high and low lateral right atrium, and the posterolateral left atrium (n = 13 patients). The longest conduction time from each pacing to each recording site was considered the total atrial activation time for the respective pacing site. During high right atrial pacing, the total atrial activation time was determined by the conduction to the distal coronary sinus (118 ± 18 ms), during coronary sinus ostium pacing by the conduction to the high right atrium (94 ± 18 ms), and during Bachmann's bundle pacing by the conduction to the distal coronary sinus (74 ± 18 ms). The total atrial activation time was signifiantly shorter during pacing from Bachmann's bundle, as compared to pacing from other right atrial sites. Thus, in normal atria, pacing from the insertion of Bachmann's bundle causes a shorter total atrial activation time and less interatrial conduction delay, as compared to pacing from other right atrial sites. These findings may have implications for alternative pacing sites for prevention of atrial fibrillation.

[1]  G. Bachmann,et al.  THE INTER-AURICULAR TIME INTERVAL , 1916 .

[2]  M. Josephson,et al.  Site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delay. Relationship to initiation of atrial fibrillation. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  J E Saffitz,et al.  Tissue-specific determinants of anisotropic conduction velocity in canine atrial and ventricular myocardium. , 1994, Circulation research.

[4]  M S Spach,et al.  Discontinuous propagation: an hypothesis based on known cardiac structural complexities. , 1985, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Saksena,et al.  Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  A SippensGroenewegen,et al.  Use of electroanatomic mapping to delineate transseptal atrial conduction in humans. , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  R Lazzara,et al.  Electrical conduction between the right atrium and the left atrium via the musculature of the coronary sinus. , 1998, Circulation.

[8]  M Hill,et al.  Acute effects of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with spontaneous and inducible atrial flutter and fibrillation. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Josephson,et al.  Coronary sinus pacing prevents induction of atrial fibrillation. , 1996, Circulation.

[10]  R. Barr,et al.  Excitation Sequences of the Atrial Septum and the AV Node in Isolated Hearts of the Dog and Rabbit , 1971, Circulation research.

[11]  S. Saksena,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients with drug-refractory atrial flutter and fibrillation after single- and dual-site right atrial pacing for arrhythmia prevention. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  D G Gibson,et al.  Architecture of atrial musculature in humans. , 1995, British heart journal.

[13]  B. Gersh,et al.  The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation. A population-based study over three decades. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Durrer,et al.  A combined electrophysiological and anatomical study of the human fetal heart. , 1976, American heart journal.

[15]  P. Wolf,et al.  Characteristics and prognosis of lone atrial fibrillation. 30-year follow-up in the Framingham Study. , 1985, JAMA.

[16]  L. Thuesen,et al.  Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome , 1994, The Lancet.

[17]  C. Tai,et al.  Effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology: implicating the mechanism of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation. , 1997, Circulation.

[18]  M. N. Morrow,et al.  Electrical Potential Distribution Surrounding the Atria during Depolarization and Repolarization in the Dog , 1969, Circulation research.