Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implications for models of lexical access

We investigated the processes of lexical retrieval during the production of adjectival noun phrases (NPs) such as "the blue kite". We used various current assumptions about the scope of grammatical and phonological encoding and about the locus of the classic frequency effect to derive predictions about possible frequency effects in the NP naming task. The predictions were tested in two picture-naming experiments where we manipulated orthogonally the frequencies of the adjective and of the noun that composed the NPs. We consistently found frequency effects for both adjectives and nouns. Moreover the effects were additive. We argue that the existence of a frequency effect for the noun during noun phrase production restricts the various combinations of assumptions that speech production models can hold simultaneously. Possible implications of the additivity of the effects for the time course of lexical access are also discussed.

[1]  H. Schriefers.  Phonological Facilitation in the Production of Two-word Utterances , 1999 .

[2]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[3]  A Caramazza,et al.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study. , 1998 .

[5]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The production of determiners: evidence from French , 2002, Cognition.

[7]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[9]  F. Ferreira.  Creation of prosody during sentence production. , 1993, Psychological review.

[10]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  An MEG Study of Picture Naming , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[12]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors , 1990 .

[13]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Producing Simple Sentences: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1998 .

[14]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Parallelism in the Production of Noun Phrases: Experiments and Reaction Time Models. , 1999 .

[15]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[16]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[17]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .

[18]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Where Do Semantic Errors Come From? , 1990, Cortex.

[20]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[21]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[22]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[24]  Albert Costa,et al.  The Production of Noun Phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the Scope of Phonological Encoding in Speech Production☆ , 2002 .

[25]  Mark Smith.  Conceptual structures in language production. , 2000 .

[26]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[27]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Lexical access in the production of noun phrases , 1992, Cognition.

[28]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[29]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[30]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[31]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[32]  A. Wingfield.  Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[34]  A. Meyer.  Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[35]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[38]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[39]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words , 1983, Cognition.

[40]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production , 1999, Cognition.