Robotics and computer vision techniques combined with non-invasive consumer biometrics to assess quality traits from beer foamability using machine learning: A potential for artificial intelligence applications

Abstract Foam-related parameters greatly influence other sensory attributes of beer such as aromas, flavors and mouthfeel; therefore, the visual assessment of beers is one of the most important quality traits, since it creates the first impression of consumers in determining the willingness to taste the product and perceived quality. Sensory analysis has been extensively used to assess consumers acceptability; however, this can only obtain their self-reported conscious responses. Therefore, biometric techniques have been used to assess the subconscious responses, which provide more information from consumers when integrated with sensory evaluation questionnaires. In this study, non-invasive biometrics along with a sensory questionnaire were used to assess consumers perception to visual attributes of 15 beers from pouring videos obtained using the RoboBEER (automatic robotic pourer). The sensory session was conducted with 30 participants using an integrated camera system, which consists of an infrared thermal camera and video recording coupled with a Bio-sensory computer application (App) and an eye tracking device. Objective physical parameters from beer pouring were obtained using the RoboBEER and computer vision algorithms. Results from the Just About Right (JAR) and acceptance tests showed that consumers preferred top fermentation beers, which have a medium foam height and stability, and tend to highly penalize bottom fermentation beers with lower foam. The principal components analysis explained a total of 52% of data variability. A correlation matrix was developed to assess significant correlations between the conscious, subconscious and physical data such as the positive correlation between perceived quality and heart rate, and the negative correlation between foam stability liking and foam drainage. Furthermore, an artificial neural network model (ANN) with 82% accuracy was developed using 28 parameters from the subconscious and objective physical data as inputs to classify beers per participant according to their level of liking of foam height (low and high). The combined use of these techniques showed to be an accurate and rapid tool to assess the visual sensory perception of beers based on the RoboBEER and biometric outputs from consumers with significant potential applications for fast screening within the beer industry.

[1]  Sigfredo Fuentes,et al.  Assessment of beer quality based on foamability and chemical composition using computer vision algorithms, near infrared spectroscopy and machine learning algorithms. , 2018, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[2]  D. T. Watts,et al.  Catecholamine excretion in men exposed to cold. , 1960, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Understanding affective interaction: Emotion, engagement, and internet videos , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.

[4]  Cees de Graaf,et al.  Autonomic nervous system responses on and facial expressions to the sight, smell, and taste of liked and disliked foods , 2012 .

[5]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Consumer Visual Processing of Food Labels: Results from an Eye‐Tracking Study , 2013 .

[6]  Herbert Stone,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Practices , 1985 .

[7]  P. Varela,et al.  Are fish products healthy? Eye tracking as a new food technology tool for a better understanding of consumer perception , 2014 .

[8]  Sylvia D. Kreibig,et al.  Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Lucía Antúnez,et al.  How do design features influence consumer attention when looking for nutritional information on food labels? Results from an eye-tracking study on pan bread labels , 2013, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[10]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Eulerian video magnification for revealing subtle changes in the world , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  Charles W. Bamforth,et al.  Beer: A Quality Perspective , 2011 .

[12]  D. Torrico,et al.  Analysis of thermochromic label elements and colour transitions using sensory acceptability and eye tracking techniques , 2018 .

[13]  S. Boesveldt,et al.  Dynamics of autonomic nervous system responses and facial expressions to odors , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[14]  M. Mensink,et al.  ANS Responses and Facial Expressions Differentiate between the Taste of Commercial Breakfast Drinks , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Owen R. Fennema Química de los alimentos , 1992 .

[16]  Claudia Gonzalez Viejo,et al.  Images and chocolate stimuli affect physiological and affective responses of consumers: A cross-cultural study , 2017 .

[17]  C. Bamforth,et al.  The path analysis method of eliminating preferred stimuli (PAMEPS) as a means to determine foam preferences for lagers in European judges based upon image assessment , 2003 .

[18]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[19]  Sigfredo Fuentes,et al.  Development of a robotic pourer constructed with ubiquitous materials, open hardware and sensors to assess beer foam quality using computer vision and pattern recognition algorithms: RoboBEER. , 2016, Food research international.

[20]  Sigfredo Fuentes,et al.  Integration of non-invasive biometrics with sensory analysis techniques to assess acceptability of beer by consumers , 2019, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[22]  Olga Kochukhova,et al.  Preverbal infants anticipate that food will be brought to the mouth: an eye tracking study of manual feeding and flying spoons. , 2010, Child development.

[23]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  When 3 is a Jerk and E is a King: Personifying Inanimate Objects in Synesthesia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[25]  C. Bamforth Perceptions of Beer Foam , 2000 .

[26]  C. J. Dale,et al.  Studies on the physical and compositional changes in collapsing beer foam , 1999 .

[27]  Sandra Haindl,et al.  Facial expressions and autonomous nervous system responses elicited by tasting different juices. , 2014, Food research international.

[28]  M. D. Fumi,et al.  How Foam Appearance Influences the Italian Consumer's Beer Perception and Preference , 2011 .

[29]  Sarah E. Kemp,et al.  Sensory evaluation: a practical handbook. , 2009 .

[30]  Harry T. Lawless Quantitative Sensory Analysis: Psychophysics, Models and Intelligent Design , 2013 .