Microstimulation of extrastriate area MST influences performance on a direction discrimination task.

1. Evidence from single-unit recordings suggests that neurons in the medial superior temporal visual area (MST) carry directional signals that influence psychophysical judgements of motion direction. We tested this hypothesis by electrically stimulating clusters of directionally selective neurons in MST (the dorsomedial subdivision, primarily) while rhesus monkeys performed a two-alternative, forced-choice direction discrimination task. 2. We performed forty-six microstimulation experiments on two rhesus monkeys. The visual stimuli were dynamic random dot patterns in which the strength of a coherent motion signal could be varied continuously about psychophysical threshold. The monkeys were rewarded for reporting correctly the direction of the coherent motion signal. Microstimulation was applied on half the trials, selected randomly, and the psychophysical data were analyzed to determine whether stimulation of MST neurons influenced the monkeys' choices. 3. Microstimulation influenced the monkeys' performance in a statistically significant manner in 67% of the experiments. In all but one of the significant experiments, microstimulation biased the monkeys' choices toward the direction of motion encoded by MST neurons at the stimulation site. Microstimulation had little effect on the slopes of the psychometric functions, suggesting that the stimulation-induced neural activity resembled a relatively pure motion "signal" rather than "noise." 4. Microstimulation exerted strong effects on the monkeys' behavior only when the visual stimulus was located within the multiunit receptive field measured at the stimulation site. This kind of spatial specificity has also been observed in the middle temporal visual area (MT), but receptive fields in MST are typically much larger than those in MT. Thus MST microstimulation effects are characterized by a coarser spatial scale: stimulation of a single site in MST can influence judgements over a much larger portion of the visual field than equivalent stimulation in MT. 5. Microstimulation was often most effective when visual stimuli were placed within a particularly responsive subregion of the receptive field (a "hot spot"). 6. The results show that MST neurons, like MT neurons, can strongly influence performance on a direction discrimination task. Whether MT and MST influence the decision process in parallel or in series remains to be determined.

[1]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of motion perception. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Pursuit and optokinetic deficits following chemical lesions of cortical areas MT and MST. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Visual motion: linking neuronal activity to psychophysical performance , 1995 .

[5]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  T D Albright,et al.  Cortical processing of visual motion. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  L. Postman,et al.  Probability learning in a problem-solving situation. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W. D. Thompson,et al.  Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[13]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The middle temporal visual area in the macaque: Myeloarchitecture, connections, functional properties and topographic organization , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[17]  C D Salzman,et al.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. , 1994, Science.

[18]  Hidehiko Komatsu,et al.  A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[23]  J. Goodnow Determinants of choice-distribution in two-choice situations. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: Representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[31]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.