The kindergarten path effect revisited: children's use of context in processing structural ambiguities.

Research with adults has shown that ambiguous spoken sentences are resolved efficiently, exploiting multiple cues--including referential context--to select the intended meaning. Paradoxically, children appear to be insensitive to referential cues when resolving ambiguous sentences, relying instead on statistical properties intrinsic to the language such as verb biases. The possibility that children's insensitivity to referential context may be an artifact of the experimental design used in previous work was explored with 60 4- to 11-year-olds. An act-out task was designed to discourage children from making incorrect pragmatic inferences and to prevent premature and ballistic responses by enforcing delayed actions. Performance on this task was compared directly with the standard act-out task used in previous studies. The results suggest that young children (5 years) do not use contextual information, even under conditions designed to maximize their use of such cues, but that adult-like processing is evident by approximately 8 years of age. These results support and extend previous findings by Trueswell and colleagues (Cognition (1999), Vol. 73, pp. 89-134) and are consistent with a constraint-based learning account of children's linguistic development.

[1]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[2]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[3]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[4]  Stephen Crain,et al.  On not being led down the kindergarten path , 2003 .

[5]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[6]  Helen Goodluck Knowledge Integration in Processing and Acquisition: Comments on Grimshaw and Rosen , 1990 .

[7]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  H. Goodluck,et al.  Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses , 1982, Cognition.

[9]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[10]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Against lexical generation of syntax , 1989 .

[12]  P. Carey,et al.  Why five-year-olds cannot understand before and after , 1972 .

[13]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  A. Sheldon The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[15]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  Acquisition of cognitive compiling , 1984, Cognition.

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Mitsuhiko Ota,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2003 .

[18]  Edward H. Matthei,et al.  The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences , 1982, Cognition.

[19]  John Trueswell Lila Children ’ s Eye Movements during Listening : Developmental Evidence for a Constraint-Based Theory of Sentence Processing , 2004 .

[20]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[21]  E. Clark On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after , 1971 .

[22]  G. Altmann Ambiguity in sentence processing , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Evan Kidd,et al.  English-Speaking Children's Comprehension of Relative Clauses: Evidence for General-Cognitive and Language-Specific Constraints on Development , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[25]  C. N. Cofer Origins of the journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior , 1978 .

[26]  E. Bates Processing Complex Sentences: A Cross-linguistic Study , 1999 .

[27]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[28]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[30]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Language Processing and Language Acquisition , 1990 .

[32]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[33]  Letícia Maria Sicuro Corrêa,et al.  An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses , 1995 .