Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems

Collective migration has become a paradigm for emergent behaviour in systems of moving and interacting individual units resulting in coherent motion. In biology, these units are cells or organisms. Collective cell migration is important in embryonic development, where it underlies tissue and organ formation, as well as pathological processes, such as cancer invasion and metastasis. In animal groups, collective movements may enhance individuals' decisions and facilitate navigation through complex environments and access to food resources. Mathematical models can extract unifying principles behind the diverse manifestations of collective migration. In biology, with a few exceptions, collective migration typically occurs at a ‘mesoscopic scale’ where the number of units ranges from only a few dozen to a few thousands, in contrast to the large systems treated by statistical mechanics. Recent developments in multi-scale analysis have allowed linkage of mesoscopic to micro- and macroscopic scales, and for different biological systems. The articles in this theme issue on ‘Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration’ compile a range of mathematical modelling ideas and multi-scale methods for the analysis of collective migration. These approaches (i) uncover new unifying organization principles of collective behaviour, (ii) shed light on the transition from single to collective migration, and (iii) allow us to define similarities and differences of collective behaviour in groups of cells and organisms. As a common theme, self-organized collective migration is the result of ecological and evolutionary constraints both at the cell and organismic levels. Thereby, the rules governing physiological collective behaviours also underlie pathological processes, albeit with different upstream inputs and consequences for the group. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems’.

[1]  J. Kennedy,et al.  The migration of the Desert Locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forsk.) I. The behaviour of swarms. II. A theory of long-range migrations , 1951, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[2]  N. Mermin,et al.  Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models , 1966 .

[3]  I. Aoki A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[4]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[6]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  A model for osmotropotactic orientation (II) , 1992 .

[7]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[8]  A. Huth,et al.  The simulation of the movement of fish schools , 1992 .

[9]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[10]  H. Dingle Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move , 1996 .

[11]  Andreas Deutsch,et al.  Dynamics of cell and tissue motion , 1997 .

[12]  H. Hoffmann,et al.  Dynamics of cell and tissue motion , 1998 .

[13]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  A Brief History of Stigmergy , 1999, Artificial Life.

[14]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Spatial patterns in ant colonies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems , 2002, Connect. Sci..

[19]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  Generalized kinetic (Boltzmann) models: mathematical structures and applications , 2002 .

[20]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  Dynamics of cancer progression , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[23]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The blind leading the blind: Modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[24]  P.-P. Grasse La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chezBellicositermes natalensis etCubitermes sp. la théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs , 1959, Insectes Sociaux.

[25]  Andreas Deutsch,et al.  Nonequilibrium clustering of self-propelled rods. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  The interplay between a self-organized process and an environmental template: corpse clustering under the influence of air currents in ants , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants "behave" like molecules? , 2006 .

[28]  A. Bertozzi,et al.  Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions: patterns, stability, and collapse. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[29]  I. Couzin Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[30]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  John M Beggs,et al.  The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Felipe Cucker,et al.  Emergent Behavior in Flocks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[33]  S. Smale,et al.  On the mathematics of emergence , 2007 .

[34]  A. Deutsch,et al.  Cellular automata as microscopic models of cell migration in heterogeneous environments. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[35]  R. Preuss,et al.  Anomalous dynamics of cell migration , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  E. Karsenti Self-organization in cell biology: a brief history , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Physical forces during collective cell migration , 2009 .

[39]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Serotonin Mediates Behavioral Gregarization Underlying Swarm Formation in Desert Locusts , 2009, Science.

[40]  Andrew C. Oates,et al.  Quantitative approaches in developmental biology , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  P. Rørth,et al.  Collective cell migration. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[42]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[43]  C. Weijer Collective cell migration in development , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[44]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Collective Information Processing and Pattern Formation in Swarms, Flocks, and Crowds , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Multiphase and Multiscale Trends in Cancer Modelling , 2009 .

[46]  D. Chialvo Emergent complex neural dynamics , 2010, 1010.2530.

[47]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  M. Poujade,et al.  Velocity fields in a collectively migrating epithelium. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[49]  P. Bourgine,et al.  Cell Lineage Reconstruction of Early Zebrafish Embryos Using Label-Free Nonlinear Microscopy , 2010, Science.

[50]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[51]  C. van der Lingen,et al.  Overview of the KwaZulu-Natal sardine run , 2010 .

[52]  B. Chopard,et al.  Lattice-Gas Cellular Automaton Models for Biology: From Fluids to Cells , 2010, Acta biotheoretica.

[53]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming , 2010 .

[54]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Cell Mechanics. From single scale-based models to multiscale modeling , 2010 .

[55]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[56]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[57]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[58]  Andreas Deutsch,et al.  Traffic jams, gliders, and bands in the quest for collective motion of self-propelled particles. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[59]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Animal dynamics based approach for modeling pedestrian crowd egress under panic conditions , 2011 .

[60]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  P. Friedl,et al.  Classifying collective cancer cell invasion , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[63]  Abbas Shirinifard,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[64]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[65]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Locust Dynamics: Behavioral Phase Change and Swarming , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[66]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[67]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework , 2012, PloS one.

[68]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Collective motion in biological systems , 2012, Interface Focus.

[69]  Raluca Eftimie,et al.  Hyperbolic and kinetic models for self-organized biological aggregations and movement: a brief review , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[70]  C. Whitchurch,et al.  Stigmergy , 2013, Communicative & Integrative Biology.

[71]  Annick Lesne,et al.  Multiscale Analysis of Biological Systems , 2013, Acta biotheoretica.

[72]  C. Whitchurch,et al.  Stigmergy , 2013, Communicative & integrative biology.

[73]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[74]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Nonautonomous contact guidance signaling during collective cell migration , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  R. Estes The Gnu's World , 2014 .

[76]  Daniel S. Calovi,et al.  Swarming, schooling, milling: phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model , 2013, 1308.2889.

[77]  W. Bialek,et al.  Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  J. Carrillo,et al.  Non-local kinetic and macroscopic models for self-organised animal aggregations , 2014, 1407.2099.

[79]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment , 2014, bioRxiv.

[80]  Walter de Back,et al.  Morpheus: a user-friendly modeling environment for multiscale and multicellular systems biology , 2014, Bioinform..

[81]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[82]  A. Cavagna,et al.  Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[83]  D. Goldman,et al.  Glass-like dynamics in confined and congested ant traffic. , 2015, Soft matter.

[84]  Stephanie N. Jorgensen,et al.  Mathematical models of wound healing and closure: a comprehensive review , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[85]  M. Starz-Gaiano,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Collective Cell Migration in a Three-Dimensional, Heterogeneous Environment , 2015, PloS one.

[86]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Collective response to perturbations in a data-driven fish school model , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[87]  H. Chaté,et al.  Intermittent collective dynamics emerge from conflicting imperatives in sheep herds , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[88]  Nir S. Gov,et al.  Collective Cell Motility Promotes Chemotactic Prowess and Resistance to Chemorepulsion , 2015, Current Biology.

[89]  Lynne Turnbull,et al.  Stigmergy co-ordinates multicellular collective behaviours during Myxococcus xanthus surface migration , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[90]  Wei Dai,et al.  Modeling and analysis of collective cell migration in an in vivo three-dimensional environment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[91]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Effect of obstacle position in the flow of sheep through a narrow door. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[92]  M Cristina Marchetti,et al.  Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues. , 2015, Physical Review X.

[93]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Plasticity of Cell Migration In Vivo and In Silico. , 2016, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[94]  Andrew J. Ewald,et al.  A collective route to metastasis: Seeding by tumor cell clusters , 2016, Science.

[95]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Stigmergic construction and topochemical information shape ant nest architecture , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  K. Swanson,et al.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[97]  Robert G. Endres,et al.  A critical-like collective state leads to long-range cell communication in Dictyostelium discoideum aggregation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[98]  B. Klink,et al.  Cell adhesion heterogeneity reinforces tumour cell dissemination: novel insights from a mathematical model , 2017, Biology Direct.

[99]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  The impact of architecture on collective behaviour , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[100]  Andreas Deutsch,et al.  Cellular automaton modeling of biological pattern formation , 2009 .

[101]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tuning Collective Cell Migration by Cell-Cell Junction Regulation. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[102]  G. D. de Polavieja,et al.  Ontogeny of collective behavior reveals a simple attraction rule , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  Dora Biro,et al.  Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[104]  Daniel S. Calovi,et al.  Switching between individual and collective motility in B lymphocytes is controlled by cell-matrix adhesion and inter-cellular interactions , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[105]  Randy Heiland,et al.  PhysiCell: An open source physics-based cell simulator for 3-D multicellular systems , 2017, bioRxiv.

[106]  M. A. Muñoz Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems , 2017, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[107]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Disentangling and modeling interactions in fish with burst-and-coast swimming reveal distinct alignment and attraction behaviors , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[108]  F. Peruani,et al.  Self-Propelled Rods: Insights and Perspectives for Active Matter , 2019, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[109]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Kinetic models with non-local sensing determining cell polarization and speed according to independent cues , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[110]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Computational and robotic modeling reveal parsimonious combinations of interactions between individuals in schooling fish , 2019, bioRxiv.

[111]  Mattia G. Bergomi,et al.  idtracker.ai: tracking all individuals in small or large collectives of unmarked animals , 2019, Nature Methods.

[112]  R. G. Endres,et al.  Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies of Caenorhabditis elegans in patchy food distributions , 2019, bioRxiv.

[113]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  Autocrine inhibition of cell motility can drive epithelial branching morphogenesis in the absence of growth , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[114]  Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies of Caenorhabditis elegans in patchy food distributions , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[115]  F. Peruani,et al.  Flocking in complex environments—Attention trade-offs in collective information processing , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[116]  S. F. Schoeller,et al.  Collective dynamics of sperm cells , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[117]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Collective information processing in human phase separation , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[118]  S. Zapperi,et al.  Cell–cell adhesion and 3D matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion , 2020, Nature Cell Biology.

[119]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  A data-driven method for reconstructing and modelling social interactions in moving animal groups , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[120]  Marco Scianna,et al.  An agent-based approach for modelling collective dynamics in animal groups distinguishing individual speed and orientation , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[121]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Collective migration and patterning during early development of zebrafish posterior lateral line , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[122]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Modelling physical limits of migration by a kinetic model with non-local sensing , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[123]  V. Guttal,et al.  Noise-induced effects in collective dynamics and inferring local interactions from data , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[124]  Adam Shellard,et al.  Rules of collective migration: from the wildebeest to the neural crest , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[125]  J. Spatz,et al.  Dynamic heterogeneity influences the leader–follower dynamics during epithelial wound closure , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[126]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Computational and robotic modeling reveal parsimonious combinations of interactions between individuals in schooling fish , 2020, PLoS computational biology.

[127]  Yangjin Kim,et al.  Collective invasion of glioma cells through OCT1 signalling and interaction with reactive astrocytes after surgery , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[128]  Li Chen,et al.  Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[129]  F. Peruani,et al.  Modelling collective cell motion: are on- and off-lattice models equivalent? , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.