Reproducibility of 3-dimensional ultrasound readings of volume of carotid atherosclerotic plaque

BackgroundNon-invasive 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) has emerged as the predominant approach for evaluating the progression of carotid atherosclerosis and its response to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of a central reading procedure concerning plaque volume (PV), measured by 3D US in a multinational US trial.MethodsTwo data sets of 45 and 60 3D US patient images of plaques (mean PV, 71.8 and 39.8 μl, respectively) were used. PV was assessed by means of manual planimetry. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied to determine reader variabilities. The repeatability coefficient (RC) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to investigate the effect of number of slices (S) in manual planimetry and plaque size on measurement variability.ResultsIntra-reader variability was small as reflected by ICCs of 0.985, 0.967 and 0.969 for 3 appointed readers. The ICC value generated between the 3 readers was 0.964, indicating that inter-reader variability was small, too. Subgroup analyses showed that both intra- and inter-reader variabilities were lower for larger than for smaller plaques. Mean CVs were similar for the 5S- and 10S-methods with a RC of 4.7 μl. The RC between both methods as well as the CVs were comparatively lower for larger plaques.ConclusionBy implementing standardised central 3D US reading protocols and strict quality control procedures highly reliable ultrasonic re-readings of plaque images can be achieved in large multicentre trials.

[1]  J David Spence,et al.  Technology Insight: ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque—patient management, genetic research, and therapy evaluation , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[2]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[4]  M. Shoukri Reliability for continuous scale measurements , 2003 .

[5]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[6]  J David Spence,et al.  Ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque as a surrogate outcome for coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  M. Shoukri,et al.  Measures of Interobserver Agreement , 2003 .

[8]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Measurement of Carotid Plaque Volume by 3-Dimensional Ultrasound , 2004, Stroke.

[9]  R. Armentano,et al.  Experimental and clinical validation of arterial diameter waveform and intimal media thickness obtained from B-mode ultrasound image processing. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  G. Berglund,et al.  Ultrasound-determined intima-media thickness and atherosclerosis. Direct and indirect validation. , 1994, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[11]  K. Stumpe,et al.  Comparison of the effects of losartan and atenolol on common carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with hypertension: results of a 2-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. , 2002, Clinical therapeutics.

[12]  E. Agabiti-Rosei,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque volume changes following 2-year angiotensin II-receptor blockade. The Multicentre Olmesartan atherosclerosis Regression Evaluation (MORE) study. , 2007, Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease.

[13]  Matthias W. Lorenz,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Circulation.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report , 2006 .

[15]  G. Mancia,et al.  Calcium Antagonist Lacidipine Slows Down Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis: Principal Results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[16]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  A. Fenster,et al.  3D ultrasound analysis of carotid plaque volume and surface morphology. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[18]  C. Kessler,et al.  Three-dimensional power-mode ultrasound for quantification of the progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[19]  G Mirra,et al.  Ultrafast three-dimensional ultrasound: application to carotid artery imaging. , 1998, Stroke.

[20]  Alfried Germing,et al.  Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness , 2007 .

[21]  C. Furberg,et al.  Reliability of longitudinal ultrasonographic measurements of carotid intimal-medial thicknesses. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study Research Group. , 1996, Stroke.

[22]  C. Tracy,et al.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.