SUMMARY This paper investigates two different longitudinal control policies for automatically controlled vehicles. One is based on maintaining a constant spacing between the vehicles while the other is based upon maintaining a constant headway (or time) between successive vehicles. To avoid collisions in the platoon, controllers have to be designed to ensure string stability, i.e the spacing errors should not get amplified as they propagate upstream from vehicle to vehicle. A measure of string stability is introduced and a systematic method of designing constant spacing controllers which guarantee string stability is presented. The constant headway policy does not require inter-vehicle communication to assure string stablity. Also, since inter-vehicle communication is not required it can be used in systems with mixed automated-nonautomated vehicles, e.g for AICC (Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control). It is shown in this paper that for all the autonomous headway control laws, the desired control torques ...
[1]
Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.
Trajectory Tracking in Robotic Systems using Variable Structure Control without a Reaching Phase
,
1992,
1992 American Control Conference.
[2]
M. Vidyasagar,et al.
New relationships between input-output and Lyapunov stability
,
1982
.
[3]
Jo Yung Wong,et al.
Theory of ground vehicles
,
1978
.
[4]
Charles A. Desoer,et al.
INDIRECT ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF A CLASS OF INTERCONNECTED NONLINEAR DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
,
1991
.
[5]
J.K. Hedrick,et al.
Longitudinal Vehicle Controller Design for IVHS Systems
,
1991,
1991 American Control Conference.
[6]
J. K. Hedrick,et al.
Automotive Powertrain Modeling for Control
,
1989
.
[7]
Petros A. Ioannou,et al.
Autonomous intelligent cruise control
,
1993
.
[8]
Weiping Li,et al.
Applied Nonlinear Control
,
1991
.