Full-Thickness and Unstageable Pressure Injuries That Develop in Nursing Home Residents Despite Consistently Good Quality Care

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether stage 3, 4, and unstageable pressure injuries develop despite consistently good quality care (CGQC); ascertain whether these wounds occur without prior recognition of a lower-stage pressure injury; and to describe and analyze characteristics of nursing home residents and their higher-stage pressure injuries. DESIGN: Descriptive, nonexperimental, prospective analysis. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 20 residents from facilities participated in the study; research sites were located in 7 counties in Western Washington and Orange County, along with a single site in Wisconsin. METHODS: CGQC facilities were identified using a 3-step incremental approach. Research assistants verified CGQC at the facility level. After data collection was complete, a Longitudinal, Expert, All-Data Panel reviewed cases for a final resident-level validity check for CGQC. Remaining cases were submitted to analysis. RESULTS: Residents who developed advanced stage pressure injuries despite CGQC were older, had limited mobility, dementia, comorbid conditions, urinary or fecal incontinence, and infections. The pressure injuries were relatively small and had little-to-no undermining, exudate, or edema. CONCLUSIONS: Stage 3, 4, and unstageable pressure injuries were observed in nursing home residents despite CGQC. Results from this study may serve as a baseline for further research to evaluate characteristics of these wounds when they develop under settings of poor-quality care. Findings also may be useful in creating evidence-based practice guidelines to support decision making around mandatory reporting, diagnosis, and prosecution.

[1]  Margaret Goldberg,et al.  Unavoidable Pressure Injury: State of the Science and Consensus Outcomes , 2014, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[2]  Jane Nixon,et al.  A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework , 2014, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  M. Guihan,et al.  Potentially modifiable risk factors among veterans with spinal cord injury hospitalized for severe pressure ulcers: a descriptive study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[4]  S. Hirst,et al.  Institutional Abuse of Older Adults: What We Know, What We Need to Know , 2012, Journal of elder abuse & neglect.

[5]  D. Nadzam,et al.  Identifying gaps, barriers, and solutions in implementing pressure ulcer prevention programs. , 2011, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  S. Cha,et al.  Risk Factors for Pressure Ulceration in an Older Community-Dwelling Population , 2011, Advances in skin & wound care.

[7]  Barbara Bates-Jensen,et al.  Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool: Pictorial Guide Validation Project , 2010, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[8]  V. D. G. de Gouveia Santos,et al.  Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in the Institutionalized Elderly , 2010, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[9]  Leanne Richbourg,et al.  North Carolina Wound Nurses Examine Heel Pressure Ulcers , 2009, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[10]  Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society Position Statement on Avoidable Versus Unavoidable Pressure Ulcers , 2009, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[11]  G. Rodeheaver,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[12]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Long‐Term Care Liability for Pressure Ulcers , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  C. Vandeweerd,et al.  Neglect assessment in urban emergency departments and confirmation by an expert clinical team. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[14]  M. Tsokos,et al.  Medico-legal aspects of pressure sores. , 2003, Legal medicine.

[15]  M. Meehan,et al.  Pressure ulcers in nursing homes: does negligence litigation exceed available evidence? , 2002, Ostomy/wound management.

[16]  V. D. Di Maio,et al.  Homicide by Decubitus Ulcers , 2002, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[17]  D. Berlowitz,et al.  Are pressure ulcers preventable? A survey of experts. , 2001, Advances in skin & wound care.

[18]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. , 1998, Nursing research.

[19]  O. Lungu,et al.  Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long‐term care: A meta‐analysis , 2015, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[20]  P. Iyer Liability in the care of the elderly. , 2004, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[21]  Richard J. Bonnie,et al.  Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America , 2003 .

[22]  J. S. Taylor Malpractice implications of pressure ulcers. , 1994, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[23]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. , 1992, Decubitus.