Restriction of Receptor Movement Alters Cellular Response: Physical Force Sensing by EphA2

Moving Signals Many types of human breast cancers overexpress a cell-surface receptor—EphA2—a tyrosine kinase activated by the ligand ephrin-A1 present on adjoining cells. Salaita et al. (p. 1380; see the Perspective by Paszek and Weaver) studied the regulation of mechanically stimulated EphA2 signaling by inducing intermembrane signaling between living EphA2-expressing human breast cancer cells and supported membranes displaying laterally mobile ephrin-A1. When the receptors engaged their ligands, they formed clusters that moved radially to the junction between the cells and the membranes. Physically impeding this movement altered the cellular response to ephrin-A1. Different breast cancer cell lines showed differences in receptor movement that correlated with their invasion potential, and might indicate their capacity for metastasis formation. Mechanical forces acting on a cell-surface receptor affect the activation of a signaling pathway involved in breast cancer. Activation of the EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase by ephrin-A1 ligands presented on apposed cell surfaces plays important roles in development and exhibits poorly understood functional alterations in cancer. We reconstituted this intermembrane signaling geometry between live EphA2-expressing human breast cancer cells and supported membranes displaying laterally mobile ephrin-A1. Receptor-ligand binding, clustering, and subsequent lateral transport within this junction were observed. EphA2 transport can be blocked by physical barriers nanofabricated onto the underlying substrate. This physical reorganization of EphA2 alters the cellular response to ephrin-A1, as observed by changes in cytoskeleton morphology and recruitment of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10. Quantitative analysis of receptor-ligand spatial organization across a library of 26 mammary epithelial cell lines reveals characteristic differences that strongly correlate with invasion potential. These observations reveal a mechanism for spatio-mechanical regulation of EphA2 signaling pathways.

[1]  T. Hunter,et al.  Coexpressed EphA Receptors and Ephrin-A Ligands Mediate Opposing Actions on Growth Cone Navigation from Distinct Membrane Domains , 2005, Cell.

[2]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  T. Hunter,et al.  EphrinA1-induced cytoskeletal re-organization requires FAK and p130cas , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  The Extracellular Matrix: Not Just Pretty Fibrils , 2009, Science.

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[6]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery , 2003, Genome Biology.

[7]  T. Pawson,et al.  Cell Signaling in Space and Time: Where Proteins Come Together and When They’re Apart , 2009, Science.

[8]  J. Rosen,et al.  Modelling breast cancer: one size does not fit all , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[9]  J. Groves,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy using supported lipid bilayer standards. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[10]  K. Kullander,et al.  Mechanisms and functions of eph and ephrin signalling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  Martin Lackmann,et al.  Crystal structure of an Eph receptor–ephrin complex , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Christopher S. Chen Mechanotransduction – a field pulling together? , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[13]  Andrew W Boyd,et al.  Three Distinct Molecular Surfaces in Ephrin-A5 Are Essential for a Functional Interaction with EphA3*[boxs] , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  M. Kinch,et al.  c-Cbl-dependent EphA2 protein degradation is induced by ligand binding. , 2002, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[15]  Wen-Lin Kuo,et al.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[16]  Kinase-dependent and -independent roles of EphA2 in the regulation of prostate cancer invasion and metastasis. , 2009, The American journal of pathology.

[17]  K. Lidke,et al.  Actin restricts FcɛRI diffusion and facilitates antigen-induced receptor immobilization , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  T Pawson,et al.  Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. , 1994, Science.

[19]  Chen Li,et al.  Repelling class discrimination: ephrin-A5 binds to and activates EphB2 receptor signaling , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Cluster size regulates protein sorting in the immunological synapse , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  M. Lackmann,et al.  Eph, a Protein Family Coming of Age: More Confusion, Insight, or Complexity? , 2008, Science Signaling.

[22]  R. Neve,et al.  A conditional feedback loop regulates Ras activity through EphA2. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[23]  C. Blobel,et al.  Adam Meets Eph: An ADAM Substrate Recognition Module Acts as a Molecular Switch for Ephrin Cleavage In trans , 2005, Cell.

[24]  P. Herrlich,et al.  CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropattern formation in supported lipid membranes. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[26]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  Adam Byron,et al.  Integrin ligands at a glance , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[29]  H. Verschueren,et al.  Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications. , 1985, Journal of cell science.

[30]  K. Mossman,et al.  Altered TCR Signaling from Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses , 2005, Science.

[31]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Stella Hurtley,et al.  Spatial cell biology. Location, location, location. Introduction. , 2009, Science.

[33]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[34]  J. Groves,et al.  Spatial mutation of the T cell immunological synapse. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[35]  R. Neve,et al.  A Fluid Membrane‐Based Soluble Ligand‐Display System for Live‐Cell Assays , 2006, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[36]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Tissue Geometry Determines Sites of Mammary Branching Morphogenesis in Organotypic Cultures , 2006, Science.

[37]  S. Boxer,et al.  Micropatterning Fluid Lipid Bilayers on Solid Supports , 1997, Science.