Renovation of school building: energy retrofit and seismic upgrade in a school building in Motta di Livenza.

The main part of Italian building stock was built before the energy and seismic regulations, so most of buildings need comprehensive refurbishment to achieve the performance required by laws that are in force. This paper presents an experimental study for an energy and structural upgrade methodology, applied to an existing school building in the north-east of Italy. The methodology is based on the International Energy Agency–Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme (IEA–EBC) Annex 56 project guidelines. For the energy retrofit, a set of interventions is defined concerning the building envelope and systems. Among these interventions, the optimal cost is identified: this minimizes the energy demand and the CO2 emissions, and reduces the financial commitment. The analysis of the seismic retrofit is developed using innovative techniques of intervention and high-performance materials. The proposed interventions are evaluated in terms of efficacy and cost. The results show that it is possible to identify a comprehensive energy retrofit at optimal cost, thanks to high energy saving and subsidies. For the seismic retrofit, the intervention with the higher cost-effectiveness ratio is determined, but the related investment does not have a payback time. The union of the two retrofits permits the combination of benefits and has a payback time for both the interventions. It is possible to state that the cost of a combined intervention is lower than the costs of two different interventions; therefore, when a single retrofit is needed, the possibility of a combined intervention should be evaluated.

[1]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  IEA EBC Annex56 vision for cost effective energy and carbon emissions optimization in building renovation , 2015 .

[2]  Niki Gaitani,et al.  Paving the Way to Nearly Zero Energy Schools in Mediterranean Region- ZEMedS Project , 2015 .

[3]  Bodis Katalin,et al.  Energy Renovation: The Trump Card for the New Start for Europe , 2015 .

[4]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Design of seismic retrofit measures for concrete and masonry structures , 1995 .

[5]  M. Cattaneo,et al.  The Amatrice 2016 seismic sequence: a preliminary look at the mainshock and aftershocks distribution , 2016 .

[6]  J. Gustavo Tumialan,et al.  Fiber-Reinforced Composites for the Strengthening of Masonry Structures , 2003 .

[7]  Ezzeldin Y. Sayed-Ahmed,et al.  Carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) post-tensioned masonry diaphragm walls: prestressing, behaviour, and design recommendations , 1999 .

[8]  Abdolreza S. Moghadam,et al.  Pushover procedure for seismic analysis of buildings , 1998 .

[9]  N. Shrive The use of fibre reinforced polymers to improve seismic resistance of masonry , 2006 .

[10]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Methodology for cost-effective energy and carbon emissions optimization in building renovation (Annex 56): methodology and assessment of renovation measures by parametric calculations , 2014 .

[11]  F. Fornari,et al.  Energy performance assessment and a retrofit strategies in public school buildings in Rome , 2014 .

[12]  N. D’Agostino,et al.  Contemporary crustal extension in the Umbria–Marche Apennines from regional CGPS networks and comparison between geodetic and seismic deformation , 2009 .