Leveraging Smartphone Advances for Continuous Location Privacy

Location privacy preservation algorithms for nearby points-of-interest (POI) search have evolved in the recent years. However, a majority of the proposals assume that points of interests are ranked only by distance, and demand extensive architectural changes. As a result, a significant gap remains between academic proposals and the industry standard of implementing location based services. Recent advances in mobile device capabilities, more specifically in their computational power and energy efficiency, have opened the possibility of engaging the client hardware more actively in the execution of a privacy algorithm, thereby relaxing strong dependencies on trusted third parties or the service provider. With this motivation, we propose a novel privacy algorithm for use in POI search that achieves much of the desired location privacy by restricting the usage of precise location data to the client device.

[1]  Panos Kalnis,et al.  Location Diversity: Enhanced Privacy Protection in Location Based Services , 2009, LoCA.

[2]  Bart Preneel,et al.  Towards Measuring Anonymity , 2002, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[3]  David Chaum,et al.  Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms , 1981, CACM.

[4]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Quantifying Location Privacy , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[5]  Chi-Yin Chow,et al.  A peer-to-peer spatial cloaking algorithm for anonymous location-based service , 2006, GIS '06.

[6]  Kyriakos Mouratidis,et al.  Preventing Location-Based Identity Inference in Anonymous Spatial Queries , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  Michael K. Reiter,et al.  Crowds: anonymity for Web transactions , 1998, TSEC.

[8]  Ling Liu,et al.  Supporting anonymous location queries in mobile environments with privacygrid , 2008, WWW.

[9]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  USENIX Association , 1992 .

[10]  Ling Liu,et al.  Location Privacy in Mobile Systems: A Personalized Anonymization Model , 2005, 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'05).

[11]  Jun Pang,et al.  Measuring Anonymity with Relative Entropy , 2006, Formal Aspects in Security and Trust.

[12]  Ying Cai,et al.  Feeling-based location privacy protection for location-based services , 2009, CCS.

[13]  Rinku Dewri,et al.  Beyond the thin client model for location privacy , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Privacy and Security in Mobile Systems (PRISMS).

[14]  Ian Goldberg,et al.  Achieving Efficient Query Privacy for Location Based Services , 2010, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[15]  George Danezis,et al.  Towards an Information Theoretic Metric for Anonymity , 2002, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.