Communication network routing using neural nets-numerical aspects and alternative approaches

The authors discuss various approaches of using Hopfield networks in routing problems in computer communication networks. It is shown that the classical approach using the original Hopfield network leads to evident numerical problems, and hence is not practicable. The heuristic choice of the Lagrange parameters, as presented in the literature, can result in incorrect solutions for variable dimensions, or is very time consuming, in order to search the correct parameter sets. The modified method using eigenvalue analysis using predetermined parameters yields recognizable improvements. On the other hand, it is not able to produce correct solutions for different topologies with higher dimensions. From a numerical viewpoint, determining the eigenvalues of the connection matrix involves severe problems, such as stiffness, and shows evident instability of the simulated differential equations. The authors present possible alternative approaches such as the self-organizing feature map and modifications of the Hopfield net, e.g. mean field annealing, and the Pottglas model.<<ETX>>

[1]  J. J. Hopfield,et al.  “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  A New Method for Mapping Optimization Problems Onto Neural Networks , 1989, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[3]  Jorma Laaksonen,et al.  Variants of self-organizing maps , 1990, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[4]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990 .

[5]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Mahesan Niranjan,et al.  A theoretical investigation into the performance of the Hopfield model , 1990, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  A. Owens,et al.  Efficient training of the backpropagation network by solving a system of stiff ordinary differential equations , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[8]  H.E. Rauch,et al.  Neural networks for routing communication traffic , 1988, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[9]  Anthony Ephremides,et al.  A neural network approach to routing in multihop radio networks , 1991, IEEE INFCOM '91. The conference on Computer Communications. Tenth Annual Joint Comference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies Proceedings.

[10]  Duane DeSieno,et al.  Adding a conscience to competitive learning , 1988, IEEE 1988 International Conference on Neural Networks.