Applying the Formal Concept Analysis to Introduce Guidance in an Inquiry-Based Learning Environment

The European research project weSPOT aims at supporting science learning in secondary and higher education. The underlying pedagogical approach, inquiry-based learning, is often criticized for the lack in teaching learning content and for overburden novice learners. To fill this gap, we developed the Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) tool which is used by teachers to define a knowledge domain, i.e. The objects, attributes and their relations to each other. Learning resources can be assigned to subsets of objects and attributes. By navigating through the concept lattice students get an overview of the topic. They learn by consuming learning resources, either in a self-regulated way, by interacting with the nodes of the lattice, or when following a recommender system which suggests learning resources based on the domain model and defined pedagogical rules. The paper describes the FCA tool and how it is used by teachers and students, and the recommendation strategy that supports students when browsing the knowledge domain.

[1]  Uta Priss Using FCA to Analyse How Students Learn to Program , 2013, ICFCA.

[2]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills , 2011 .

[3]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[4]  Olga Firssova,et al.  User-driven Development of an Inquiry-Based Learning Platform: Qualitative Formative Evaluations in weSPOT , 2014, IxD&A.

[5]  Moffat Mathews,et al.  Do Your Eyes Give It Away? Using Eye Tracking Data to Understand Students' Attitudes towards Open Student Model Representations , 2012, ITS.

[6]  Amruth N. Kumar,et al.  Open learner models in intelligent tutoring system , 2007 .

[7]  Erik Duval,et al.  TEL as a Recommendation Context , 2013 .

[8]  Nils Jensen,et al.  Using FCA for Modelling Conceptual Difficulties in Learning Processes , 2012 .

[9]  Cherukuri Aswani Kumar,et al.  Exploring Attributes with Domain Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis , 2013, J. Comput. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[12]  Paul Brna,et al.  Extending the scope of the student model , 1995, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[13]  Matthew D. Pistilli,et al.  Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success , 2012, LAK.

[14]  Judy Kay,et al.  Open Learner Models , 2010, Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[15]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Factors and Skills , 2014, ICFCA.

[16]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Personal recommender systems for learners in lifelong learning networks: the requirements, techniques and model , 2008, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[17]  Erik Duval,et al.  WESPOT: Inquiry based learning meets learning analytics , 2012 .

[18]  Rudolf Wille,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis as Mathematical Theory of Concepts and Concept Hierarchies , 2005, Formal Concept Analysis.

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[20]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Rudolf Wille,et al.  Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts , 2009, ICFCA.