Optical analysis of deviations in a concentrating photovoltaics central receiver system with a flux homogenizer.

The application of a kaleidoscope as a flux homogenizer to a concentrating photovoltaics system with a central receiver is investigated. The optical setup of a primary dish-type concentrator, a secondary homogenizer optics, and a photovoltaic receiver is simulated using ray tracing. The influence of various deviations from the ideal-namely sunshape (circumsolar radiation), shading, tracking error, and shape of the primary optical concentrator-on the performance of the homogenizer is analyzed quantitatively using the optical efficiency and the normalized standard deviation as a measure of inhomogeneity. Flux distributions for different progressively increasing deviations are discussed qualitatively. Experimental validation of the simulation is presented. It is demonstrated that the performance of the homogenizer is not particularly sensitive to sunshape. If sufficient length is provided, the homogenizer effectively compensates for tracking error, misalignment, and shape deviations of the primary concentrator. Yet despite the presence of the homogenizer, shading due to the holder of the receiver significantly affects the flux distribution at the receiver.

[1]  Frank Dimroth,et al.  Present Status in the Development of III–V Multi-Junction Solar Cells , 2012 .

[2]  P. Glaser,et al.  The flux redistributor An optical element for achieving flux uniformity , 1963 .

[3]  I. Luque-Heredia,et al.  The Sun Tracker in Concentrator Photovoltaics , 2012 .

[4]  Abraham Kribus,et al.  Front-side interconnected large area concentrator cells for compact concentrator modules , 2012 .

[5]  Harald Ries,et al.  High-flux photovoltaic solar concentrators with kaleidoscope-based optical designs , 1997 .

[6]  Anna Heimsath,et al.  Outdoor Test Setup for Concentrating Photovoltaic and Thermal (CPVT) Systems , 2011 .

[7]  S. Horne,et al.  A Solid 500 Sun Compound Concentrator PV Design , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[8]  Carsten Agert,et al.  Modeling of concentrating photovoltaic and thermal systems , 2014 .

[9]  Kathi Kreske,et al.  Optical design of a solar flux homogenizer for concentrator photovoltaics. , 2002, Applied optics.

[10]  Frank Dimroth,et al.  Development, characterisation and 1000 Suns outdoor tests of GaAs monolithic interconnected module (MIM) receivers , 2008 .

[11]  Rani Moran,et al.  Efficient, Low Cost Dish Concentrator for a CPV Based Cogeneration System , 2011 .

[12]  A W Bett,et al.  Processing Techniques for Monolithic Interconnection of Solar Cells at Wafer Level , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[13]  Antonio Luque,et al.  The FLATCON System from Concentrix Solar , 2007 .

[14]  Scott A. Jones,et al.  REPRESENTATIVE TERRESTRIAL SOLAR BRIGHTNESS PROFILES , 2002 .

[15]  C. Bingham,et al.  Performance and Reliability of Multijunction III-V Modules for Concentrator Dish and Central Receiver Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[16]  Yosef Meller,et al.  Kaleidoscope homogenizers sensitivity to shading , 2013 .

[17]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[19]  C. Dey,et al.  Sunshape distributions for terrestrial solar simulations , 2003 .

[20]  David L. Shealy,et al.  Design of reflectors which will distribute sunlight in a specified manner , 1975 .

[21]  P. E. Glaser,et al.  The Use of a Kaleidoscope to Obtain Uniform Flux Over a Large Area in a Solar or Arc Imaging Furnace , 1963 .

[22]  Tim Kubera,et al.  Water Cooled TJ Dense Array Modules for Parabolic Dishes , 2010 .

[23]  K. Araki,et al.  Development of concentrator modules with dome‐shaped Fresnel lenses and triple‐junction concentrator cells , 2005 .