A 2-year intercomparison of the WAM-Cycle4 and the WAVEWATCH-III wave models implemented within the Mediterranean Sea

In this work we present the implementation of a wave forecast/hindcast system for the Mediterranean Sea at a 1/10o horizontal resolution and we show a first assessment of its performance by inter-comparing model results to observational data time series at selected points for the period 2000-2001. The system which is part of the POSEIDON-II operational system includes the WAM – Cycle4 and the WAVEWATCH-III wave forecast models (implemented within the same region) one way coupled with the non-hydrostatic version of the ETA atmospheric model which provides at 3-hour intervals the necessary wind velocity fields to the wave models. The same system but based on the WAM-Cycle4 wave model, has been used in the past for the production of the Aegean Sea wind and wave Atlas. Overall, the inter-comparison shows that both wave models are rather skilful in predicting the integral wave parameters with significant wave height skill scores in the range 0.85-0.90 and mean period scores in the range 0.77-0.83. It is also evident that WAM model has a tendency to overestimate mean wave periods while the opposite is true for WAVEWATCH-III model. Differences between the two models simulated spectra exist along the main passage of cyclonic systems over the Mediterranean Sea while in the wind seas dominated areas of the basin (the Aegean Sea for example) the two models show almost the same behavior.

[1]  Hendrik L. Tolman,et al.  Source Terms in a Third-Generation Wind Wave Model , 1996 .

[2]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  On the Existence of a Fully Developed Wind-Sea Spectrum , 1984 .

[3]  Takvor H. Soukissian,et al.  A New Wind and Wave Atlas of the Hellenic Seas , 2008 .

[4]  S. Hasselmann,et al.  Computations and Parameterizations of the Nonlinear Energy Transfer in a Gravity-Wave Spectrum. Part I: A New Method for Efficient Computations of the Exact Nonlinear Transfer Integral , 1985 .

[5]  Jin Wu Wind‐stress coefficients over sea surface from breeze to hurricane , 1982 .

[6]  H. Tolman Subgrid modeling of moveable-bed bottom friction in wind wave models , 1995 .

[7]  D. Chalikov,et al.  Parameterization of Wave Boundary Layer. , 1995, Atmosphere.

[8]  Luigi Cavaleri,et al.  Characteristics of quadrant and octant advection schemes in wave models , 1998 .

[9]  Julia C. Hargreaves,et al.  The spectral wave model, WAM, adapted for applications with high spatial resolution , 2000 .

[10]  J. Miles On the generation of surface waves by shear flows , 1957, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  W. Pierson,et al.  A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of S , 1964 .

[12]  J. A. Battjes,et al.  ENERGY LOSS AND SET-UP DUE TO BREAKING OF RANDOM WAVES , 1978 .

[13]  W. Perrie,et al.  The Impact of Waves on Surface Currents , 2003 .

[14]  Peter A. E. M. Janssen,et al.  Improvement of the Short-Fetch Behavior in the Wave Ocean Model (WAM) , 1999 .

[15]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Computations and Parameterizations of the Nonlinear Energy Transfer in a Gravity-Wave Specturm. Part II: Parameterizations of the Nonlinear Energy Transfer for Application in Wave Models , 1985 .

[16]  Hendrik L. Tolman,et al.  Effects of Numerics on the Physics in a Third-Generation Wind-Wave Model , 1992 .

[17]  D. Chalikov,et al.  One-dimensional theory of the wave boundary layer , 1993 .

[18]  G. Mellor The Three-Dimensional Current and Surface Wave Equations , 2003 .

[19]  John W. Miles,et al.  On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 5 , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  N. Booij,et al.  Modeling wind waves using wavenumber-direction spectra and a variable wavenumber grid , 1998 .