Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used to modify brain activity noninvasively and to study brain-behavior relations. However, results can be variable and the conditions that affect the functional efficacy of TMS remain unclear. Here we show that on-line TMS can either facilitate or suppress perceptual functions depending on the baseline level of activity of the targeted brain region. When TMS was applied over the motion selective region V5/MT during a simple motion-detection task, subjects' motion-detection ability was impaired. Similarly, suppression of V5/MT activity using off-line 1 Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) disrupted performance in a subsequent motion-detection task. However, paradoxically, on-line V5/MT TMS had a facilitatory effect on motion detection if V5/MT had been suppressed by off-line 1-Hz rTMS prior to the motion-detection task. These results demonstrate that TMS can have an unexpected facilitatory effect on behavior when the targeted neural population is in a suppressed state. Our findings provide further evidence for the view that the effects of TMS are modulated by the initial activation state of the targeted neural population.

[1]  M. Nitsche,et al.  External modulation of visual perception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[4]  Jared Rutter,et al.  Regulation of Clock and NPAS2 DNA Binding by the Redox State of NAD Cofactors , 2001, Science.

[5]  J. Cummings,et al.  The neuroanatomy of depression. , 1993, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[6]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[7]  R. Goebel,et al.  Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Cerebral visual motion blindness: transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5 , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  B. Fierro,et al.  Modulation of visual cortical excitability in migraine with aura: effects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  J. Silvanto,et al.  A novel approach for enhancing the functional specificity of TMS: Revealing the properties of distinct neural populations within the stimulated region , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Antonio Valentin,et al.  Late EEG responses triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the evaluation of focal epilepsy , 2008, Epilepsia.

[15]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Visual area V5/MT remembers "what" but not "where". , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  Richard A. Tyrrell,et al.  A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: The Modified Binary Search (MOBS) , 1988 .

[23]  S. Anand,et al.  The selectivity and timing of motion processing in human temporo–parieto–occipital and occipital cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[28]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[30]  A. Cowey,et al.  Motion perception and perceptual learning studied by magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[31]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Noninvasive human brain stimulation. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[32]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Effect of tonic voluntary activity on the excitability of human motor cortex. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex , 2001, Neurology.

[35]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Functional Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Signal Suppression or Neural Noise Generation? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Cowey,et al.  Neural activation state determines behavioral susceptibility to modified theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Functionally Specific Reorganization in Human Premotor Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[40]  Bruce Luber,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially affects speed and direction judgments , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulatory effects of low‐ and high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  G. Orban,et al.  Response latencies of visual cells in macaque areas V1, V2 and V5 , 1989, Brain Research.