Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians

In previous studies, the technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) has been widely used by information technology researchers to gain a better understanding of information technology (IT) adoption and its use in organizations. While TAM has been applied and tested in academic and corporate settings, involving students, business managers, clerical and administrative types as subjects, few studies have evaluated TAM in the health care environment. This study examines the applicability of the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2) of Venkatesh and Davis (2000) in the context of physicians' intention to adopt Internet-based health applications. Data were collected in a survey of pediatricians to see how well the extended model, fits in the medical sector. Our results partially confirm the model, however significant theoretical aspects were not supported. One of the core perception variables, perceived ease of use, did not predict intention to use in this study. As theorized, the primary predictor variable perceived usefulness was a strong determinant of intention to use. This paper discusses the implications, limitations, and possible explanations for the inconsistencies within the model when applied to such professional users as physicians.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  L. M. Wong Kee Song,et al.  The physician and the Internet. , 1997, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[7]  D. R. Dixon,et al.  Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation , 2000, AMIA.

[8]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User acceptance of information technology , 2001 .

[10]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[11]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Rohan Jayasuriya,et al.  Determinants of microcomputer technology use: implications for education and training of health staff , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[14]  RICHARD N. SHIFFMAN,et al.  White Paper: Information Technology for Children's Health and Health Care: Report on the Information Technology in Children's Health Care Expert Meeting, September 21-22, 2000 , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..