Trustworthiness, Risk, and the Transfer of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge between Alliance Partners

The transfer of knowledge in alliances entails risk to partners, whose willingness to accept it presumably relies on the trustworthiness that they perceive in their partners. We investigate the extent to which the perceptions of trustworthiness and the willingness to take risk determine the transfer of knowledge between alliance partners and their ultimate impact on alliance success. The results show that the transfer of tacit versus explicit knowledge have very different trust and risk profiles. Whereas explicit knowledge is closely associated with the firm's willingness to take risk, tacit knowledge is intimately related to high trustworthiness. The results support the important role of trust and the transfer of tacit knowledge on the success of learning alliances.

[1]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[2]  Bernard L. Simonin.  An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[3]  M. Becerra,et al.  Perceived Trustworthiness Within The Organization: The Moderating Impact Of Communication Frequency , 2002 .

[4]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia , 2000 .

[5]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[6]  J. Slocum,et al.  Building cooperative advantage: Managing strategic alliances to promote organizational learning , 1997 .

[7]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[8]  John K. Butler.  Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[9]  Y. Doz.  The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[10]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[11]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[12]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[13]  Yadong Luo.  Building Trust in Cross-Cultural Collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective , 2002 .

[14]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  Revisiting multinational firms' tolerance for joint ventures: a trust-based approach , 1995 .

[15]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance , 2006 .

[16]  C. Johnson-George,et al.  Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. , 1982 .

[17]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[18]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[19]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[20]  M. Zack.  Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2009 .

[21]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[22]  Andrew C. Wicks,et al.  Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics , 1998 .

[23]  Lung-Tan Lu,et al.  International Joint Ventures , 2010 .

[24]  Sevgin Eroğlu,et al.  Book Review: The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances , 1993 .

[25]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness: conceptualizing, measuring, and predicting difficulties in the transfer of knowledge within organizations , 2003 .

[26]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE INSTABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES , 1997 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity , 1999 .

[29]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[30]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[32]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning , 2001 .

[33]  Arvind Parkhe.  Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[34]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances , 1998 .

[35]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[36]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[37]  T. Das,et al.  A risk perception model of alliance structuring , 2001 .

[38]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[39]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[40]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[41]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[42]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[43]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[44]  B. Gray,et al.  Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States-China Joint Ventures: A Compa , 1994 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[46]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[47]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[48]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[49]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[50]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[51]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[52]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[53]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Building Trust in Cross-Cultural Collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective: , 2002 .

[54]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING ON AGGREGATE INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION , 1996 .

[55]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[57]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .