Interaction between Purkinje Cells and Inhibitory Interneurons May Create Adjustable Output Waveforms to Generate Timed Cerebellar Output

We develop a new model that explains how the cerebellum may generate the timing in classical delay eyeblink conditioning. Recent studies show that both Purkinje cells (PCs) and inhibitory interneurons (INs) have parallel signal processing streams with two time scales: an AMPA receptor-mediated fast process and a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)-mediated slow process. Moreover, one consistent finding is an increased excitability of PC dendrites (in Larsell's lobule HVI) in animals when they acquire the classical delay eyeblink conditioning naturally, in contrast to in vitro studies, where learning involves long-term depression (LTD). Our model proposes that the delayed response comes from the slow dynamics of mGluR-mediated IP3 activation, and the ensuing calcium concentration change, and not from LTP/LTD. The conditioned stimulus (tone), arriving on the parallel fibers, triggers this slow activation in INs and PC spines. These excitatory (from PC spines) and inhibitory (from INs) signals then interact at the PC dendrites to generate variable waveforms of PC activation. When the unconditioned stimulus (puff), arriving on the climbing fibers, is coupled frequently with this slow activation the waveform is amplified (due to an increased excitability) and leads to a timed pause in the PC population. The disinhibition of deep cerebellar nuclei by this timed pause causes the delayed conditioned response. This suggested PC-IN interaction emphasizes a richer role of the INs in learning and also conforms to the recent evidence that mGluR in the cerebellar cortex may participate in slow motor execution. We show that the suggested mechanism can endow the cerebellar cortex with the versatility to learn almost any temporal pattern, in addition to those that arise in classical conditioning.

[1]  Y Shinoda,et al.  Functional significance of excitatory projections from the precerebellar nuclei to interpositus and dentate nucleus neurons for mediating motor, premotor and parietal cortical inputs. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[2]  E. Boyden,et al.  Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiology of mammalian inferior olivary neurones in vitro. Different types of voltage‐dependent ionic conductances. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  A. Borst,et al.  Passive spatial and temporal integration of excitatory synaptic inputs in cerebellar Purkinje cells of young rats , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Joseph P. Yuan,et al.  Activation of the TRPC1 cation channel by metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1 , 2003, Nature.

[8]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[9]  I. Raman,et al.  Potentiation of Mossy Fiber EPSCs in the Cerebellar Nuclei by NMDA Receptor Activation followed by Postinhibitory Rebound Current , 2006, Neuron.

[10]  Philippe Isope,et al.  Involvement of Presynaptic N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors in Cerebellar Long-Term Depression , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a new hypothesis. , 1981, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  J. Houk,et al.  Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Adaptive timing in neural networks: The conditioned response , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  M. Mauk,et al.  Stimulus generalization of conditioned eyelid responses produced without cerebellar cortex: implications for plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei. , 2003, Learning & memory.

[15]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar anterior lobe after rabbit eyeblink conditioning. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[16]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Effect of varying the intensity and train frequency of forelimb and cerebellar mossy fiber conditioned stimuli on the latency of conditioned eye-blink responses in decerebrate ferrets. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[17]  D. Alkon,et al.  Intracellular Correlates of Acquisition and Long-Term Memory of Classical Conditioning in Purkinje Cell Dendrites in Slices of Rabbit Cerebellar Lobule HVI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Mauk,et al.  Learning-dependent timing of Pavlovian eyelid responses: differential conditioning using multiple interstimulus intervals. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  M. Mauk,et al.  Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Bower,et al.  Feedforward inhibition controls the spread of granule cell-induced Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P G Shinkman,et al.  Classical conditioning with electrical stimulation of cerebellum as both conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Dorsal accessory inferior olive activity diminishes during acquisition of the rabbit classically conditioned eyelid response , 1991, Brain Research.

[23]  C I De Zeeuw,et al.  Climbing fibre collaterals contact neurons in the cerebellar nuclei that provide a GABAergic feedback to the inferior olive. , 1997, Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Kotani,et al.  Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning , 2003, Brain Research.

[25]  P. Svensson,et al.  Short‐lasting conditioned stimulus applied to the middle cerebellar peduncle elicits delayed conditioned eye blink responses in the decerebrate ferret , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  D. Alkon,et al.  Pairing-specific long-term depression of Purkinje cell excitatory postsynaptic potentials results from a classical conditioning procedure in the rabbit cerebellar slice. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  D. Linden,et al.  Mechanisms underlying cerebellar motor deficits due to mGluR1‐autoantibodies , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[28]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells as Substrate for Adaptive Timing of the Classically Conditioned Eye-Blink Response , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  R. W. Turner,et al.  Kv1 K+ Channels Control Purkinje Cell Output to Facilitate Postsynaptic Rebound Discharge in Deep Cerebellar Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Changes in Rabbit Cerebellar Cortical and Interpositus Nucleus Activity during Acquisition, Extinction, and Backward Classical Eyelid Conditioning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[31]  Simon Hong,et al.  Inferior olive hypertrophy and cerebellar learning are both needed to explain ocular oscillations in oculopalatal tremor. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[32]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Acquisition and Extinction of the Classically Conditioned Eyelid Response in the Albino Rabbit , 1962, Science.

[33]  H. Daniel,et al.  Long term modification of cerebellar inhibition after inferior olive degeneration , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  F. Crépel,et al.  Synapses between parallel fibres and stellate cells express long‐term changes in synaptic efficacy in rat cerebellum , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  D J Rosen,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  J. Steinmetz Neuronal Activity in the Rabbit Interpositus Nucleus during Classical NM-Conditioning with a Pontine-Nucleus-Stimulation CS , 1990 .

[37]  D. Ringach Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Garrett T. Kenyon,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Cerebellar-Olivary System I: Self-Regulating Equilibrium of Climbing Fiber Activity , 1998, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[40]  D J Krupa,et al.  Inactivation of the superior cerebellar peduncle blocks expression but not acquisition of the rabbit's classically conditioned eye-blink response. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  W. N. Ross,et al.  IPSPs strongly inhibit climbing fiber-activated [Ca2+]i increases in the dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje neurons , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  Kris M. Horn,et al.  Activation of climbing fibers , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[43]  J. Rawson,et al.  Evidence that Climbing Fibers Control an Intrinsic Spike Generator in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[45]  Mark J Schnitzer,et al.  Lock-and-key mechanisms of cerebellar memory recall based on rebound currents. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  C. D. De Zeeuw,et al.  Don't get too excited: mechanisms of glutamate-mediated Purkinje cell death. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[47]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiology of guinea‐pig cerebellar nuclear cells in the in vitro brain stem‐cerebellar preparation. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  D. McCormick,et al.  Simulation of the currents involved in rhythmic oscillations in thalamic relay neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Organization of memory traces in the mammalian brain. , 1994, Annual review of neuroscience.

[50]  I. Lampl,et al.  Subthreshold oscillations of the membrane potential: a functional synchronizing and timing device. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  David J. Willshaw,et al.  A Biophysical Model of Synaptic Delay Learning and Temporal Pattern Recognition in a Cerebellar Purkinje Cell , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[52]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[53]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Reversing cerebellar long-term depression , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  N Ramnani,et al.  Reversible inactivations of the cerebellum prevent the extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in rabbits. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  Narender Ramnani,et al.  Reversible inactivations of the cerebellum with muscimol prevent the acquisition and extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  M. Womack,et al.  Dendritic Control of Spontaneous Bursting in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  A. Konnerth,et al.  Impairment of LTD and cerebellar learning by Purkinje cell–specific ablation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase I , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[59]  K. Doya,et al.  Chaos may enhance information transmission in the inferior olive. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Learned Movements Elicited by Direct Stimulation of Cerebellar Mossy Fiber Afferents , 1999, Neuron.

[61]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Reciprocal Bidirectional Plasticity of Parallel Fiber Receptive Fields in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Their Afferent Interneurons , 2002, Neuron.

[62]  M. Kawato,et al.  Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-Dependent Ca2+ Threshold Dynamics Detect Spike Timing in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  K. Doya,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of inferior olive neurons: A compartmental model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  R. Traub,et al.  A model of a CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neuron incorporating voltage-clamp data on intrinsic conductances. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  John H Freeman,et al.  Synapse formation is associated with memory storage in the cerebellum , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  M. Häusser,et al.  Tonic Synaptic Inhibition Modulates Neuronal Output Pattern and Spatiotemporal Synaptic Integration , 1997, Neuron.

[67]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Responses in the inferior olive to stimulation of the cerebellar and cerebral cortices in the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[68]  Yutaka Kirino,et al.  Time-Dependent Reorganization of the Brain Components Underlying Memory Retention in Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  J. Billard,et al.  Persistent reduction of Purkinje cell inhibition on neurones of the cerebellar nuclei after climbing fibre deafferentation , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.

[70]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Inhibiting the Expression of a Classically Conditioned Behavior Prevents Its Extinction , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Gengxin Chen,et al.  Microinfusion of protein kinase inhibitor H7 into the cerebellum impairs the acquisition but not the retention of classical eyeblink conditioning in rabbits , 2000, Brain Research.

[72]  D L Alkon,et al.  Dendritic excitability microzones and occluded long-term depression after classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[73]  J. Desclin,et al.  The olivocerebellar system. I. Delayed and slow inhibitory effects: An overlooked salient feature of cerebellar climbing fibers , 1980, Brain Research.

[74]  R. Llinás,et al.  Patterns of Spontaneous Purkinje Cell Complex Spike Activity in the Awake Rat , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[76]  F. Bengtsson,et al.  Cerebellar inhibition of inferior olivary transmission in the decerebrate ferret , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[77]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit brainstem during performance of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane (NM)/eyelid response , 1983, Brain Research.

[78]  D. Linden,et al.  Regulation of the rebound depolarization and spontaneous firing patterns of deep nuclear neurons in slices of rat cerebellum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[79]  N. Donegan,et al.  A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[80]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Reacquisition of classical conditioning after removal of cerebellar cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[82]  Jacob Bollinger,et al.  Purkinje Cell Synapses Target Physiologically Unique Brainstem Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  K. Doya,et al.  Unsupervised learning of granule cell sparse codes enhances cerebellar adaptive control , 2001, Neuroscience.

[84]  P. Strata,et al.  Effects of inferior olive inactivation and lesion on the activity of medial vestibular neurons in the rat , 1993, Neuroscience.

[85]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  A Scalable Model of Cerebellar Adaptive Timing and Sequencing: The Recurrent Slide and Latch (RSL) Model , 2002, Applied Intelligence.

[86]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[87]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Temporal specificity of long-term depression in parallel fiber--Purkinje synapses in rat cerebellar slice. , 1995, Learning & memory.

[88]  Yutaka Kirino,et al.  Purkinje cell activity during classical eyeblink conditioning in decerebrate guinea pigs , 2006, Brain Research.

[89]  Dieter Jaeger,et al.  Synaptic shunting by a baseline of synaptic conductances modulates responses to inhibitory input volleys in cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[90]  George J. Augustine,et al.  Local calcium signalling by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate in Purkinje cell dendrites , 1998, Nature.

[91]  David G. Lavond,et al.  Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations , 1985, Brain Research.

[92]  Idan Segev,et al.  Low-amplitude oscillations in the inferior olive: a model based on electrical coupling of neurons with heterogeneous channel densities. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[93]  D. Kopsco,et al.  Functional coupling of intracellular calcium and inactivation of voltage-gated Kv1.1/Kvbeta1.1 A-type K+ channels. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[94]  June-Seek Choi,et al.  Cerebellar neuronal activity expresses the complex topography of conditioned eyeblink responses. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[95]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A neural model of timed response learning in the cerebellum , 1994, Neural Networks.

[96]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[97]  T. Otis,et al.  Excitation of cerebellar interneurons by group I metabotropic glutamate receptors. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[98]  Milton Pong,et al.  Inhibitory Control of Olivary Discharge , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[99]  D. Alkon,et al.  Learning-specific differences in Purkinje-cell dendrites of lobule HVI (Lobulus simplex): intracellular recording in a rabbit cerebellar slice , 1991, Brain Research.

[100]  D. Robinson,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation and reversible lesions of the olivocerebellar pathway on Purkinje cell activity in the flocculus of the cat , 1985, Brain Research.

[101]  G. Laurent,et al.  Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies , 1997, Nature.

[102]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Feed‐forward inhibition shapes the spike output of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[103]  P. Blazquez,et al.  Kinematics of spontaneous, reflex, and conditioned eyelid movements in the alert cat. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[104]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response , 1985, Brain Research.

[105]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Observations on the intracortical relations of the climbing fibers of the cerebellum. A Golgi study , 1954, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[106]  F K Hoehler,et al.  Double responding in classical nictitating membrane conditioning with single-CS dual-ISI training , 1976, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.