Animation as a computational framework for architectural design composition

ABSTRACT The paper develops computation, through dynamic grammars, as a third equivalent to syntactical and typological understanding of architectural design. Within theory of architectural design, syntactical and typological understanding of architecture are the two main scientific paradigms that explain how architecture is formed and conducted. As such the premise of the paper is to connect computational design as an equivalent understanding of architecture, one which has parity with the classical theoretical canon of the architectural design theories of the 20th century. To accomplish this, Dynamic grammars, i.e. shape grammars developed through animation are presented and analysed along with their mechanisms. Shape Grammars have been selected as a vehicle for this as they provide an excellent model of architectural composition with computational design, using simple mechanisms. A case study of constructivist design is analysed using dynamic grammars, showcasing the elegance and efficiency of the system in describing variants of design, maintaining parity in a syntactical and a typological understanding of design. The paper concludes with the characteristics that a computational understanding of architectural design has.

[1]  Michael Batty,et al.  Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 1996 .

[2]  Bill Hillier,et al.  How is design possible , 2013 .

[3]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[4]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[5]  Dounas Theodoros.  Some Notes on the Incompleteness Theorem and Shape Grammars , 2013 .

[6]  Rudi Stouffs,et al.  Algorithmic complexity of shape grammar implementation , 2018, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[7]  Jane Rendell.  Architectural research and disciplinarity , 2004 .

[8]  Dounas Theodoros.  Dynamic Algebras and Grammars , 2008, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe).

[9]  George Stiny,et al.  Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing , 2006 .

[10]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[11]  T. Knight.  Computing with Ambiguity , 2003 .

[12]  Zvi Hecker.  Visionary Drawings of Architecture and Planning: 20th Century through the 1960s by George R. Collins (review) , 1981 .

[13]  Terry Knight,et al.  Computing with Emergence , 2003 .

[14]  José Pinto Duarte,et al.  Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: The Grammar of Siza's Houses at Malagueira , 2005 .

[15]  Mira Mezini,et al.  Pi: a Pattern Language , 2009, OOPSLA.

[16]  A. Economou,et al.  Four Algebraic Structures In Design , 2001, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA).

[17]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[18]  Alan Colquhoun,et al.  Essays in Architectural Criticism: Modern Architecture and Historical Change , 1981 .

[19]  Gülen Çagdas,et al.  COMPUTATION: The New Realm of Architectural Design , 2009 .