Integral based source selection for uncooperative distributed information retrieval environments

In this paper, a new source selection algorithm for uncooperative distributed information retrieval environments is presented. The algorithm functions by modeling each information source as an integral, using the relevance score and the intra-collection position of its sampled documents in reference to a centralized sample index and selects the collections that cover the largest area in the rank-relevance space. Based on the above novel metric, the algorithm explicitly focuses on addressing the two goals of source selection; high recall which is important for source recommendation applications and high precision aiming to produce a high precision final merged list. For the latter goal in particular, the new approach steps away from the usual practice of DIR systems of explicitly declaring the number of collections that must be queried and instead receives as input only the number of retrieved documents in the final merged list, dynamically calculating the number of collections that are selected and the number of documents requested from each. The algorithm is tested in a wide range of testbeds in both recall and precision oriented settings and its effectiveness is found to be equal or better than other state-of-the-art algorithms.

[1]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Okapi at TREC-3 , 1994, TREC.

[2]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The INQUERY Retrieval System , 1992, DEXA.

[3]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Searching distributed collections with inference networks , 1995, SIGIR '95.

[4]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  GatfordCentre for Interactive Systems ResearchDepartment of Information , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Developing a Test Collection for the Evaluation of Integrated Search , 2010, ECIR.

[6]  David Hawking,et al.  Server selection methods in hybrid portal search , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[7]  Luo Si,et al.  A semisupervised learning method to merge search engine results , 2003, TOIS.

[8]  Luo Si,et al.  Modeling search engine effectiveness for federated search , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[9]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[10]  David Hawking,et al.  Evaluating sampling methods for uncooperative collections , 2007, SIGIR.

[11]  Georgios Paltoglou,et al.  Hybrid results merging , 2007, CIKM '07.

[12]  Dik Lun Lee,et al.  Server Ranking for Distributed Text Retrieval Systems on the Internet , 1997, DASFAA.

[13]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Advances in Information Retrieval: Where Is That /#*&@¢ Record? , 1985, Adv. Comput..

[14]  Craig MacDonald,et al.  Voting for candidates: adapting data fusion techniques for an expert search task , 2006, CIKM '06.

[15]  Martin Bergman,et al.  The deep web:surfacing the hidden value , 2000 .

[16]  Milad Shokouhi,et al.  Capturing collection size for distributed non-cooperative retrieval , 2006, SIGIR.

[18]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  Evaluating different methods of estimating retrieval quality for resource selection , 2003, SIGIR.

[19]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  A decision-theoretic approach to database selection in networked IR , 1999, TOIS.

[20]  Milad Shokouhi,et al.  Central-Rank-Based Collection Selection in Uncooperative Distributed Information Retrieval , 2007, ECIR.

[21]  James P. Callan,et al.  Query-based sampling of text databases , 2001, TOIS.

[22]  Luo Si,et al.  Unified utility maximization framework for resource selection , 2004, CIKM '04.

[23]  Art Lew,et al.  Dynamic Programming: A Computational Tool , 2006 .

[24]  Nick Craswell,et al.  Methods for Distributed Information Retrieval , 2000 .

[25]  James C. French,et al.  Comparing the performance of collection selection algorithms , 2003, TOIS.

[26]  Luis Gravano,et al.  GlOSS: text-source discovery over the Internet , 1999, TODS.

[27]  Peter Bailey,et al.  Engineering a multi-purpose test collection for Web retrieval experiments , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  James P. Callan,et al.  Combining document representations for known-item search , 2003, SIGIR.

[29]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Javed A. Aslam,et al.  Models for metasearch , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[31]  James P. Callan,et al.  Experiments Using the Lemur Toolkit , 2001, TREC.