Interaction of first- and second-order direction in motion-defined motion.

Motion-defined motion can play a special role in the discussion of whether one or two separate systems are required to process first- and second-order information because, in contrast to other second-order stimuli, such as contrast-modulated contours, motion detection cannot be explained by a simple input nonlinearity but requires preprocessing by motion detectors. Furthermore, the perceptual quality that defines an object (motion on the object surface) is identical to that which is attributed to the object as an emergent feature (motion of the object), raising the question of how these two object properties are linked. The interaction of first- and second-order information in such stimuli has been analyzed previously in a direction-discrimination task, revealing some cooperativity. Because any comprehensive integration of these two types of motion information should be reflected in the most fundamental property of a moving object, i.e., the direction in which it moves, we now investigate how motion direction is estimated in motion-defined objects. Observers had to report the direction of moving objects that were defined by luminance contrast or in random-dot kinematograms by differences in the spatiotemporal properties between the object region and the random-noise background. When the dots were moving coherently with the object (Fourier motion), direction sensitivity resembled that for luminance-defined objects, but performance deteriorated when the dots in the object region were static (drift-balanced motion). When the dots on the object surface were moving diagonally relative to the object direction (theta motion), the general level of accuracy declined further, and the perceived direction was intermediate between the veridical object motion direction and the direction of dot motion, indicating that the first- and second-order velocity vectors are somehow pooled. The inability to separate first- and second-order directional information suggests that the two corresponding subsystems of motion processing are not producing independent percepts and provides clues for possible implementations of the two-layer motion-processing network.

[1]  T Elbert,et al.  The cortical representation of object motion in man is inter‐individually variable , 1996, Neuroreport.

[2]  E. Pitman.  A NOTE ON NORMAL CORRELATION , 1939 .

[3]  Johannes M. Zanker.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00234-X , 1998 .

[4]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Interaction between primary and secondary mechanisms in human motion perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  George Sperling,et al.  Attention-generated apparent motion , 1995, Nature.

[6]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Sperling.  Three stages and two systems of visual processing. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[8]  U. Ilg,et al.  Initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements to first-order and second-order motion stimuli , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  J. Zanker,et al.  Motion vision : computational, neural, and ecological constraints , 2001 .

[10]  George Sperling,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Visual Motion Perception , 1999 .

[11]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Dependence on stimulus onset asynchrony in apparent motion: Evidence for two mechanisms , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  O. Braddick.  Motion may be seen but not used , 1992, Current Biology.

[15]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined contours , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[17]  P. McOwan,et al.  A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.

[19]  B. L. Gros,et al.  Anisotropies in visual motion perception: a fresh look. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field , 1986, Vision Research.

[21]  C L Baker,et al.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. , 1993, Science.

[22]  J. Zanker.  On the elementary mechanism underlying secondary motion processing. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Hayes,et al.  Apparent position governs contour–element binding by the visual system , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J M Zanker,et al.  Cortical potentials reflecting motion processing in humans , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[27]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[28]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[29]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[30]  ANDREW T SMITH,et al.  Separate Detection of Moving Luminance and Contrast Modulations: Fact or Artifact? , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  A. Derrington,et al.  Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction , 1993, Vision Research.

[33]  E. Altenmüller,et al.  Cortical potentials in humans reflecting the direction of object motion , 1993, Neuroreport.

[34]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Kinase cascade conserved , 1992, Current Biology.

[35]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds , 1975, Vision Research.

[37]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  J M Zanker,et al.  Mechanisms of human motion perception: combining evidence from evoked potentials, behavioural performance and computational modelling , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[40]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  M. Fahle,et al.  Deficits and recovery of first‐ and second‐order motion perception in patients with unilateral cortical lesions , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.