Evolving Presentation of Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of the Medical Literature and Current Practices
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Cheng,et al. The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock , 2022, Current opinion in cardiology.
[2] M. Link,et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] M. Fong,et al. Geographic variation in the use of continuous outpatient inotrope infusion therapy and beta blockers , 2022, International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature.
[4] B. Harbaoui,et al. Baseline characteristics, management, and predictors of early mortality in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK registry , 2021, ESC heart failure.
[5] N. Kapur,et al. Left ventricular unloading before percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.
[6] Andrew J. Sauer,et al. Right Heart Catheterization in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Improved Outcomes: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database , 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[7] S. Fernando,et al. Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] B. Kheiri,et al. Fifteen‐Year Trends in Incidence of Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalization and In‐Hospital Mortality in the United States , 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[9] A. Lala,et al. Patient Referral Practices to Advanced Heart Failure Centers. , 2021, Journal of cardiac failure.
[10] L. Stoletniy,et al. A Review of Inotropes and Inopressors for Effective Utilization in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.
[11] D. Morrow,et al. Epidemiology and causes of cardiogenic shock , 2021, Current opinion in critical care.
[12] J. Bakker,et al. Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock , 2021, Annals of Intensive Care.
[13] D. Baran,et al. Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[14] E. Brilakis,et al. Short term outcomes of Impella in cardiogenic shock: A review and meta-analysis of observational studies. , 2020, International journal of cardiology.
[15] D. Burkhoff,et al. Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock , 2020, Circulation. Heart failure.
[16] L. Otterspoor,et al. Vasopressors and Inotropes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.
[17] G. Filippatos,et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and contemporary management of cardiogenic shock – a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology , 2020, European journal of heart failure.
[18] A. Wong,et al. Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.
[19] J. Kobashigawa,et al. A new paradigm in mechanical circulatory support: 100 patient experience. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[20] S. Hollenberg,et al. Vasopressor and Inotrope Therapy in Cardiac Critical Care , 2020, Journal of intensive care medicine.
[21] D. Burkhoff,et al. Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support. , 2020, Circulation.
[22] T. Henry,et al. Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[23] E. Ohman,et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. , 2019, European heart journal.
[24] J. Ornato,et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[25] L. Stevenson,et al. Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure With and Without Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, Journal of cardiac failure.
[26] D. Morrow,et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SHOCK IN CONTEMPORARY CARDIAC INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: DATA FROM THE CRITICAL CARE CARDIOLOGY TRIALS NETWORK (CCCTN) REGISTRY , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[27] D. Morrow,et al. Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: Data From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[28] A. Mebazaa,et al. Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] S. van Diepen. Norepinephrine as a First-Line Inopressor in Cardiogenic Shock: Oversimplification or Best Practice? , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] O. Bodger,et al. Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[31] H. Thiele,et al. Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[32] H. Thiele,et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[33] E. Ohman,et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.
[34] N. Kapur,et al. Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: the “door to support” time , 2017, F1000Research.
[35] A. Mebazaa,et al. Current Use and Impact on 30-Day Mortality of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Results From the CardShock Study , 2019, Journal of intensive care medicine.
[36] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[37] D. Burkhoff,et al. Hemodynamics of Mechanical Circulatory Support. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[38] H. Bøtker,et al. Acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy and 5-year mortality after myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide population-based cohort study , 2015, Critical Care.
[39] J. Haerting,et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[40] K. Werdan,et al. Kardiogener Schock , 2014, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.
[41] J. Hochman,et al. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. , 2014, European heart journal.
[42] W. O’Neill,et al. The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry , 2013, Journal of interventional cardiology.
[43] A. Mebazaa,et al. The Effectiveness of Inodilators in Reducing Short Term Mortality among Patient with Severe Cardiogenic Shock: A Propensity-Based Analysis , 2013, PloS one.
[44] G. Schuler,et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[45] Sarabjeet Singh,et al. Cardiovascular Outcomes Using Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in High-Risk Acute Myocardial Infarction With or Without Cardiogenic Shock , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.
[46] M. Drazner,et al. Successful use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery for acute cellular rejection in a cardiac transplant patient. , 2011, Transplantation proceedings.
[47] P. Loyalka,et al. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[48] J. Vincent,et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[49] J. Tijssen,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? , 2008, European heart journal.
[50] D. Burkhoff,et al. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. , 2006, American heart journal.
[51] Monica R. Shah,et al. Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness The ESCAPE Trial , 2005 .
[52] G. Schuler,et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2003, European heart journal.
[53] G. Schuler,et al. Reversal of Cardiogenic Shock by Percutaneous Left Atrial-to-Femoral Arterial Bypass Assistance , 2001, Circulation.
[54] D. Burkhoff,et al. Pathophysiology and Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock. , 2020, Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal.
[55] W. Cohn,et al. Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. , 2008, Texas Heart Institute journal.
[56] W. Cohn,et al. The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge). , 2008, Texas Heart Institute journal.
[57] H. S,et al. Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .