Training of Somatosensory Discrimination After Stroke: Facilitation of Stimulus Generalization

Carey LM, Matyas TA: Training of somatosensory discrimination after stroke: Facilitation of stimulus generalization. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:428–442. Objective:Task-specific learning typifies perceptual training but limits rehabilitation of sensory deficit after stroke. We therefore investigated spontaneous and procedurally facilitated transfer of training effects within the somatosensory domain after stroke. Design:Ten single-case, multiple-baseline experiments were conducted with stroke participants who had impaired discrimination of touch or limb-position sense. Each experiment comprised three phases: baseline, stimulus-specific training of the primary discrimination stimulus, and either stimulus-specific training of the transfer stimulus or stimulus-generalization training. Both the trained and transfer stimuli were monitored throughout using quantitative, norm-referenced measures. Data were analyzed using individual time-series analysis and meta-analysis of intervention effects across case experiments. Results:Stimulus-specific training was successful for trained texture and proprioceptive discriminations, but it failed to show spontaneous transfer to related untrained stimuli in the same modality in seven of eight experiments in which this was possible. In contrast, intramodality transfer was obtained with stimulus-generalization training in four of five experiments that investigated stimulus-generalization training of texture discrimination. Findings were confirmed by meta-analysis. Conclusions:Our findings demonstrate generalization of training within a somatosensory modality poststroke, provided that a program designed to enhance transfer is used. This has implications for the design of efficient rehabilitation programs.

[1]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[2]  M. J. Blake,et al.  Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Is Unaffected by Aging , 2000, Stroke.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[4]  B. Gorman,et al.  Design and Analysis of Single-Case Research , 1996 .

[5]  L. Carey,et al.  Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  David Poeppel,et al.  Learning transfer and neuronal plasticity in humans trained in tactile discrimination , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  A Puce,et al.  Reemergence of activation with poststroke somatosensory recovery: A serial fMRI case study , 2002, Neurology.

[8]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[9]  Nancy Byl,et al.  Practice-Related Improvements in Somatosensory Interval Discrimination Are Temporally Specific But Generalize across Skin Location, Hemisphere, and Modality , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[11]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[12]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantiative Test , 1997 .

[13]  W M Jenkins,et al.  Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  L. Carey,et al.  Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  P. Roland.  Somatosensory detection in patients with circumscribed lesions of the brain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  K. Sathian,et al.  Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J Zihl,et al.  Restitution of visual function in patients with cerebral blindness. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  T. Yoshioka,et al.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[21]  D. Scott.  Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[22]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Somatosensory Loss after Stroke , 1995 .

[23]  M. Mesulam,et al.  From sensation to cognition. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  V. Mountcastle.  The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  N. Byl,et al.  Effectiveness of Sensory and Motor Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Following the Principles of Neuroplasticity: Patients Stable Poststroke , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  M Yekutiel,et al.  A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .