Indoor air pollution levels were halved as a result of a national tobacco ban in a New Zealand prison.

INTRODUCTION Few studies have measured the effect of tobacco bans on secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in prisons. From June 1, 2011, the sale of tobacco was prohibited in New Zealand prisons. One month later, the possession of tobacco was banned. We studied the indoor air quality before and after this policy was enforced. METHODS We measured indoor-fine-particulate (PM(2.5)) concentrations using a TSI SidePak photometer. The instrument was placed in a staff base of a New Zealand maximum-security prison, adjacent to four 12-cell wings. Measurements were made before the sales restriction, during this period, and after the ban. Data were summarized using daily geometric means and generalized least squares regression. RESULTS A total of 7,107 observations were recorded at 5-min intervals, on 14 days before and 15 days after implementation, between 24 May and 5 August. Before the policy was implemented, the geometric mean was 6.58 μg/m(3) (95% CI = 6.29-6.58), which declined to 5.17 μg/m(3) (95% CI = 4.93-5.41) during the sales ban, and fell to 2.44 μg/m(3) (95% CI = 2.37-2.52) after the smoking ban. Regression analyses revealed an average 57% (95% CI = 42-68) decline in PM(2.5) concentrations, comparing the before and after periods. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a rapid and substantial improvement in indoor air quality after tobacco was banned at a prison. We conclude that prisoners have reduced their smoking in line with the ban, and that a significant health hazard has been reduced for staff and prisoners alike.

[1]  Jean-François Etter,et al.  Exposure to tobacco smoke before and after a partial smoking ban in prison: indoor air quality measures , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[2]  Neil E Klepeis,et al.  Determination of response of real-time SidePak AM510 monitor to secondhand smoke, other common indoor aerosols, and outdoor aerosol. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[3]  S. Brochu,et al.  Implementing an Indoor Smoking Ban in Prison: Enforcement Issues and Effects on Tobacco Use, Exposure to Second-hand Smoke and Health of Inmates , 2011, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[4]  A. Hyland,et al.  Secondhand smoke drift: examining the influence of indoor smoking bans on indoor and outdoor air quality at pubs and bars. , 2010, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[5]  K. Cummings,et al.  How smoke-free laws improve air quality: a global study of Irish pubs. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[6]  S. Proescholdbell,et al.  Indoor air quality in prisons before and after implementation of a smoking ban law , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[7]  Giorgio Cattani,et al.  Exposure to fine and ultrafine particles from secondhand smoke in public places before and after the smoking ban, Italy 2005 , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[8]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Mortality and Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution: Ongoing Analyses Based on the American Cancer Society Cohort , 2005, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[9]  K. Emmons,et al.  Inmate exposure to secondhand smoke in correctional facilities and the impact of smoking restrictions , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  M. Tobias,et al.  Causes of death classified by risk and condition, New Zealand 1997 , 2005, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[11]  James L. Repace,et al.  Respirable Particles and Carcinogens in the Air of Delaware Hospitality Venues Before and After a Smoking Ban , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.