The Effect of Surface Treatment of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses on the Attachment of Acanthamoeba castellanii Trophozoites

Objective: To determine if plasma surface treatment of Focus Night & Day silicone hydrogel contact lenses affects the attachment of Acanthamoeba. Methods: Unworn lotrafilcon A contact lenses with (Focus Night & Day) and without surface treatment and Acuvue, conventional hydrogel lenses, were quartered before 90-min incubation with Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites. After incubation and rinsing, the trophozoites attached to one surface of each quarter were counted by direct light microscopy. Sixteen replicates were observed for each lens type. Logarithmic transformation of data allowed the use of parametric analysis of variance. Results: No significant difference in attachment was established between the untreated lotrafilcon A and the conventional hydrogel lenses (P<0.001); however, surface treatment of the native Focus Night & Day material produced a significant increase in attachment (P<0.001). Conclusions: Commercially available Focus Night & Day lenses are subjected to a plasma surface treatment to reduce lens hydrophobicity; however, this procedure results in an enhanced acanthamoebal attachment. It is possible that the silicone hydrogel lens could be at a greater risk of promoting Acanthamoeba infection if exposed to the organism because of the enhanced attachment characteristic of this material. Eye care professionals should be aware of the enhanced affinity that Acanthamoeba show for this lens and accordingly emphasise to patients the significance of appropriate lens hygiene. This is particularly important where lenses are worn in a regime that could increase the chance of exposure to the organism, i.e., 6 nights/7 days extended wear or daily wear, where lenses will be stored in a lens case, or where lenses are worn when in contact with potentially contaminated water sources, i.e., swimming or showering.

[1]  J. Mehta,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis associated with contact lens wear in Singapore. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Freitas,et al.  Twenty Years of Acanthamoeba Keratitis , 2009, Cornea.

[3]  C. Joslin,et al.  Acanthamoeba Keratitis and Contact Lens Solutions: The Recent University of Illinois at Chicago Experience After the Advanced Medical Optics Complete Moistureplus Solution Recall , 2009 .

[4]  P. Beckingsale,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis cluster: an increase in Acanthamoeba keratitis in Australia , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  E. Cohen,et al.  Acanthamoeba Keratitis: A Parasite on the Rise , 2007, Cornea.

[8]  M. Kainer,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis multiple states, 2005-2007. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[9]  J. Sugar,et al.  Epidemiological characteristics of a Chicago-area Acanthamoeba keratitis outbreak. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Attachment of Acanthamoeba to Second Generation, O2OPTIX, Silicone Hydrogel, Conact Lenses , 2006 .

[11]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Attachment of Acanthamoeba to first- and second-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[12]  S. Kilvington,et al.  Effect of a Multipurpose Contact Lens Solution on the Survival and Binding of Acanthamoeba Species on Contact Lenses Examined With a No-Rub Regimen , 2005, Eye & contact lens.

[13]  Magne Helland,et al.  International contact lens prescribing in 2003 , 2009 .

[14]  P. Morgan,et al.  Characterization of the Surface of Conventional Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses by Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  D. Seal,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis update—incidence, molecular epidemiology and new drugs for treatment , 2003, Eye.

[16]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Enhanced attachment of acanthamoeba to extended-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a new risk factor for infection? , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[17]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Surface Treatment or Material Characteristic: The Reason for the High Level of Acanthamoeba Attachment to Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[18]  Paul C Nicolson,et al.  Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[19]  P. Morgan,et al.  International contact lens prescribing , 2002 .

[20]  M. Refojo,et al.  Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  D. Seal,et al.  Microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: relationship to climate, environment and contact-lens disinfection. , 2001, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[22]  C. Lakkis Silicone Hydrogels: the Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, Deborah F. Sweeney (Ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann and the British Contact Lens Association (2000), ISBN: 0750644621 , 2001 .

[23]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Salicylate inhibition of Acanthamoeba attachment to contact lenses: a model to reduce risk of infection. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[24]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  The relationship between contact lens oxygen permeability and binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human corneal epithelial cells after overnight and extended wear. , 1999, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[25]  D V Seal,et al.  Population-based cohort study of microbial keratitis in Scotland: incidence and features. , 1999, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[26]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  The Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm in the Attachment of Acanthamoeba to Four Types of Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  M. Dana,et al.  The Epidemic of Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Where Do We Stand? , 1998, Cornea.

[28]  S. Kaye 'Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Multicentre survey in England 1992-6' , 1998 .

[29]  D. Seal,et al.  Has the introduction of multi-purpose solutions contributed to a reduced incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens wearers? A review. , 1998, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[30]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Effect of Patient Wear and Extent of Protein Deposition on Adsorption of Acanthamoeba to Five Types of Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Differential Adherence of Acanthamoeba to Contact Lenses: Effects of Material Characteristics , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  B. J. Clark,et al.  Microbial contamination of contact lens cases in the west of Scotland. , 1993, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  D. Seal,et al.  Possible environmental sources of Acanthamoeba spp in contact lens wearers. , 1992, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[34]  D. Easty,et al.  Contamination of contact lens storage cases by Acanthamoeba and bacteria. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[35]  G. Visvesvara,et al.  The epidemiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United States. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  M. B. Moore,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis associated with soft contact lenses. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  C. J. Low An Illustrated Key to Freshwater and Soil Amoebae. , 1977 .

[38]  Noel Brennan,et al.  Silicone hydrogels – What are they and how should they be used in everyday practice ? , 2022 .