Controlled Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Using Passive Acoustic Emissions Monitoring

The ability of ultrasonically-induced oscillations of circulating microbubbles to permeabilize vascular barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) holds great promise for noninvasive targeted drug delivery. A major issue has been a lack of control over the procedure to ensure both safe and effective treatment. Here, we evaluated the use of passively-recorded acoustic emissions as a means to achieve this control. An acoustic emissions monitoring system was constructed and integrated into a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system. Recordings were analyzed using a spectroscopic method that isolates the acoustic emissions caused by the microbubbles during sonication. This analysis characterized and quantified harmonic oscillations that occur when the BBB is disrupted, and broadband emissions that occur when tissue damage occurs. After validating the system's performance in pilot studies that explored a wide range of exposure levels, the measurements were used to control the ultrasound exposure level during transcranial sonications at 104 volumes over 22 weekly sessions in four macaques. We found that increasing the exposure level until a large harmonic emissions signal was observed was an effective means to ensure BBB disruption without broadband emissions. We had a success rate of 96% in inducing BBB disruption as measured by in contrast-enhanced MRI, and we detected broadband emissions in less than 0.2% of the applied bursts. The magnitude of the harmonic emissions signals was significantly (P<0.001) larger for sonications where BBB disruption was detected, and it correlated with BBB permeabilization as indicated by the magnitude of the MRI signal enhancement after MRI contrast administration (R2 = 0.78). Overall, the results indicate that harmonic emissions can be a used to control focused ultrasound-induced BBB disruption. These results are promising for clinical translation of this technology.

[1]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. , 2012, Cancer research.

[2]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier: real-time feedback-controlled focused ultrasound disruption by using an acoustic emissions-based controller. , 2012, Radiology.

[3]  Junho Song,et al.  Investigation of Standing-Wave Formation in a Human Skull for a Clinical Prototype of a Large-Aperture, Transcranial MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Phased Array: An Experimental and Simulation Study , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  C. Arvanitis,et al.  Cavitation-enhanced extravasation for drug delivery. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  N. McDannold,et al.  Simultaneous temperature and cavitation activity mapping , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[6]  V. Ferrera,et al.  Feasibility of noninvasive cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and microbubbles in nonhuman primates. , 2011, Applied physics letters.

[7]  Wayne Kreider,et al.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[8]  M. Arora,et al.  A real-time controller for sustaining thermally relevant acoustic cavitation during ultrasound therapy , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Numerical prediction of frequency dependent 3D maps of mechanical index thresholds in ultrasonic brain therapy , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[11]  Meaghan A. O'Reilly,et al.  Design and construction of a passive receiver array for monitoring transcranial focused ultrasound therapy , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[12]  F. Jolesz,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional temperature distributions produced by a low-frequency transcranial focused ultrasound system within ex vivo human skulls , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging– Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Brain Tumors: Initial Findings in 3 Patients , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Miklós Gyöngy,et al.  Passive Spatial Mapping of Inertial Cavitation During HIFU Exposure , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Joseph L Bull,et al.  An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  Johannes Reichold,et al.  The microvascular system of the striate and extrastriate visual cortex of the macaque. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Effect of focused ultrasound applied with an ultrasound contrast agent on the tight junctional integrity of the brain microvascular endothelium. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI‐guided focused ultrasound , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[22]  W. Pardridge Drug Targeting to the Brain , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.

[23]  Richard Manasseh,et al.  Cavitation microstreaming patterns in single and multiple bubble systems , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  N. Logothetis,et al.  A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates , 2007 .

[25]  A. Boer,et al.  Strategies to Improve Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier , 2007, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[26]  W. Pardridge,et al.  Blood-brain barrier delivery. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[27]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Brain arterioles show more active vesicular transport of blood-borne tracer molecules than capillaries and venules after focused ultrasound-evoked opening of the blood-brain barrier. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[31]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  A numerical study of transcranial focused ultrasound beam propagation at low frequency , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Kenneth S. Suslick,et al.  Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single-bubble cavitation , 2005, Nature.

[33]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: a numerical study , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[34]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[35]  Gregory T. Clement,et al.  A non-invasive method for focusing ultrasound through the human skull. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Olgert Lindau,et al.  Collapse and rebound of a laser-induced cavitation bubble , 2001 .

[37]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[38]  D. Miller,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Activation of Contrast Agent Gas Bodies Induces Capillary Rupture in Mice. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  David Fortin,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a multicenter study using intraarterial chemotherapy in conjunction with osmotic opening of the blood‐brain barrier for the treatment of patients with malignant brain tumors , 2000, Cancer.

[40]  Tetsuya Kodama,et al.  Cavitation bubble behavior and bubble–shock wave interaction near a gelatin surface as a study of in vivo bubble dynamics , 2000 .

[41]  B. Zlokovic Outwitting the Blood-Brain Barrier for Therapeutic Purposes: Osmotic Opening and Other Means , 1998 .

[42]  E. Neuwelt,et al.  Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[43]  G. Haar The Acoustic Bubble , 1996 .

[44]  K. Kuroda,et al.  A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Claus-Dieter Ohl,et al.  Cavitation bubble collapse studied at 20 million frames per second , 1995 .

[46]  P F Morrison,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Acoustic microcavitation: its active and passive acoustic detection. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  V I Ilyichev,et al.  Spectral characteristics of acoustic cavitation. , 1989, Ultrasonics.

[50]  Padmakar P. Lele,et al.  Effects of Ultrasound on “Solid” Mammalian Tissues and Tumors In Vivo , 1987 .

[51]  J A Rooney,et al.  Hemolysis Near an Ultrasonically Pulsating Gas Bubble , 1970, Science.