Pros and Cons of Using Different Numerical Techniques for Transmission Loss Evaluation of a Small Engine Muffler

[1]  Z. L. Ji,et al.  Boundary element analysis of three-pass perforated duct mufflers , 2000 .

[2]  A. F. Seybert,et al.  A Review of Current Techniques for Measuring Muffler Transmission Loss , 2003 .

[3]  M. J. Crocker,et al.  Analysis of concentric‐tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities , 1978 .

[4]  P.O.A.L. Davies.  The design of silencers for internal combustion engines , 1964 .

[5]  F. E. Corcione,et al.  FE Fluid-Structure Interaction/Experimental Transmission Loss Factor Comparison of an Exhaust System , 2005 .

[6]  F. Saybert,et al.  Experimental determination of acoustic properties using a two-microphone random-excitation technique * , 2004 .

[7]  Ml Munjal,et al.  Analysis of a flush tube three-pass perforated element muffler by means of transfer matrices , 1997 .

[8]  Z. Ji,et al.  Acoustic Attenuation Performance Analysis of Three-pass Perforated Tube Muffler with End-resonator , 2008 .

[9]  W. L. Li,et al.  A Coupled FEM/BEM for Fluid-Structure Interaction Using Ritz Vectors and Eigenvectors , 1993 .

[10]  Fabio Bozza,et al.  The Prediction of the Performance and Gasdynamic Noise Emitted by a Medium-Size Spark-Ignition Engine by Means of 1D and 3D Analyses , 2007 .

[11]  M. S. Howe.  Acoustics of Fluid–Structure Interactions: Index , 1998 .

[12]  A. Selamet,et al.  THREE-PASS MUFFLERS WITH UNIFORM PERFORATIONS , 1999 .

[13]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems , 2001 .

[14]  J. M. Novak,et al.  Multi-pass perforated tube silencers : A computational approach , 1998 .