Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. revisão sistemática da literatura

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature about the positive predictive value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A research was performed in the online Medline database, entering the terms "predictive value" and "BI-RADS". Eleven studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The positive predictive values ranged respectively between 0% and 8%, 4% and 62%, and 54% and 100% for BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5. Three studies have also evaluated morphological criteria with higher positive predictive value in mammography, mass with spiculated margins being the finding with highest positive predictive value for malignancy. CONCLUSION: A high variability was found in the reviewed literature among positive predictive values of BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5, although methodological differences have been identified, limiting the comparative analysis.

[1]  Deutsche Version.  BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (BI-RADS TM ) , 2001 .

[2]  Nestor de Barros,et al.  ACR BI-RADS™ na ultra-sonografia , 2004 .

[3]  A Isnard,et al.  [Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience with 249 patients]. , 2002, Journal de radiologie.

[4]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.

[5]  M. Echenique,et al.  Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  P. Ugolini,et al.  Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy. , 1998, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[7]  L. Newman,et al.  Advances in breast cancer detection and management. , 2003, The Medical clinics of North America.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  Tate Ps,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: a six-year surgical experience. , 2001 .

[10]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[11]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  D. Cyrlak,et al.  Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  Hélio Sebastião Amâncio de Camargo Júnior.  BI-RADS®-ultra-som: vantagens e desvantagens dessa nova ferramenta de trabalho , 2005 .

[14]  S. Orel,et al.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  F. Hall,et al.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[16]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  G V Page,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: a six-year surgical experience. , 2001, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.

[18]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  C. Ball,et al.  Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. , 2002, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[20]  I Tocino,et al.  Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  H. Zonderland,et al.  The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population , 2004, European Radiology.

[22]  S Ciatto,et al.  Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. , 1987, Radiology.

[23]  Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler.  Considerações sobre a prevenção do câncer de mama feminino , 2003 .

[24]  M. Lacquement,et al.  Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  Yah-Yuen Tan,et al.  Positive predictive value of BI-RADS categorization in an Asian population. , 2004, Asian journal of surgery.

[26]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[27]  J. Leung,et al.  Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.