Chemotactic cell trapping in controlled alternating gradient fields

Directed cell migration toward spatio-temporally varying chemotactic stimuli requires rapid cytoskeletal reorganization. Numerous studies provide evidence that actin reorganization is controlled by intracellular redistribution of signaling molecules, such as the PI4,5P2/PI3,4,5P3 gradient. However, exploring underlying mechanisms is difficult and requires careful spatio-temporal control of external chemotactic stimuli. We designed a microfluidic setup to generate alternating chemotactic gradient fields for simultaneous multicell exposure, greatly facilitating statistical analysis. For a quantitative description of intracellular response dynamics, we apply alternating time sequences of spatially homogeneous concentration gradients across 300 μm, reorienting on timescales down to a few seconds. Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae respond to gradient switching rates below 0.02 Hz by readapting their migration direction. For faster switching, cellular repolarization ceases and is completely stalled at 0.1 Hz. In this “chemotactically trapped” cell state, external stimuli alternate faster than intracellular feedback is capable to respond by onset of directed migration. To investigate intracellular actin cortex rearrangement during gradient switching, we correlate migratory cell response with actin repolymerization dynamics, quantified by a fluorescence distribution moment of the GFP fusion protein LimEΔcc. We find two fundamentally different cell polarization types and we could reveal the role of PI3-Kinase for cellular repolarization. In the early aggregation phase, PI3-Kinase enhances the capability of D. discoideum cells to readjust their polarity in response to spatially alternating gradient fields, whereas in aggregation competent cells the effect of PI3-Kinase perturbation becomes less relevant.

[1]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Doris Heinrich,et al.  Physics of Cellular Movements , 2010 .

[3]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Quantitative time-lapse fluorescence microscopy in single cells. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[4]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Navigation of Chemotactic Cells by Parallel Signaling to Pseudopod Persistence and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  Cecile O. Mejean,et al.  Cell stimulation with optically manipulated microsources , 2009, Nature Methods.

[6]  William C. Messner,et al.  Probing Cellular Dynamics with a Chemical Signal Generator , 2009, PloS one.

[7]  Onn Brandman,et al.  Feedback Loops Shape Cellular Signals in Space and Time , 2008, Science.

[8]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Beta,et al.  Chemotaxis in microfluidic devices--a study of flow effects. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Christopher Janetopoulos,et al.  Directional sensing during chemotaxis , 2008, FEBS letters.

[11]  R. Kay,et al.  Changing directions in the study of chemotaxis , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[13]  W. Bialek,et al.  Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient , 2007, Cell.

[14]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Essential role of PI3-kinase and phospholipase A2 in Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  Eberhard Bodenschatz,et al.  Flow photolysis for spatiotemporal stimulation of single cells. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Time‐resolved responses to chemoattractant, characteristic of the front and tail of Dictyostelium cells , 2006, FEBS letters.

[18]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Gwo-Bin Lee,et al.  The hydrodynamic focusing effect inside rectangular microchannels , 2006 .

[20]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Distinct roles of PI(3,4,5)P3 during chemoattractant signaling in Dictyostelium: a quantitative in vivo analysis by inhibition of PI3-kinase. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Microfluidic system for measuring neutrophil migratory responses to fast switches of chemical gradients. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Paul Martin,et al.  Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  S. Diez,et al.  Dynamic Actin Patterns and Arp2/3 Assembly at the Substrate-Attached Surface of Motile Cells , 2004, Current Biology.

[25]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Two phases of actin polymerization display different dependencies on PI(3,4,5)P3 accumulation and have unique roles during chemotaxis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  Y. Bréchet,et al.  Shear flow-induced detachment kinetics of Dictyostelium discoideum cells from solid substrate. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[27]  O. Weiner,et al.  Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  O. Weiner,et al.  PIP3, PIP2, and cell movement--similar messages, different meanings? , 2001, Developmental cell.

[29]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of Gradients Having Complex Shapes Using Microfluidic Networks , 2001 .

[30]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The contractile vacuole network of Dictyostelium as a distinct organelle: its dynamics visualized by a GFP marker protein. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[31]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[32]  S. Stocker,et al.  DdLIM is a cytoskeleton-associated protein involved in the protrusion of lamellipodia in Dictyostelium. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Cell-substrate interactions and locomotion of Dictyostelium wild-type and mutants defective in three cytoskeletal proteins: a study using quantitative reflection interference contrast microscopy. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[34]  D Zicha,et al.  A new direct-viewing chemotaxis chamber. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[35]  P. Fisher,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum by using an image processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  R. W. Gundersen,et al.  Neuronal chemotaxis: chick dorsal-root axons turn toward high concentrations of nerve growth factor. , 1979, Science.

[37]  S. Boyden THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES , 1962, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[38]  P Yager,et al.  Theoretical analysis of molecular diffusion in pressure-driven laminar flow in microfluidic channels. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M. Papadaki,et al.  Effects of Fluid Shear Stress on Gene Regulation of Vascular Cells , 1997, Biotechnology progress.

[40]  R. Futrelle Dictyostelium Chemotactic Response to Spatial and Temporal Gradients. Theories of the Limits of Chemotactic Sensitivity and of Pseudochemotaxis , 1982, Journal of cellular biochemistry.