Getting Really Edgy: On the Edge of the Edge

The article argues that in constructions where there is more than one phrase at a phasal edge, only the highest edge is available for movement and anaphor binding. This shows that only the outermost edge counts as the edge of a phase for the Phase Impenetrability Condition (PIC). The article also demonstrates that moving the element that counts as the phasal edge in multiple specifier/adjunct cases can affect the PIC status of the remaining edges. These conclusions provide a new argument for the contextuality of phasehood. A number of recent works have argued that the phasal status of a phrase can be affected by the syntactic context in which it occurs. This article goes one step further: it shows that the concept of phasal edge, more precisely the status of a specifier/adjunct regarding the PIC, can also be affected by the syntactic context in which the specifier/adjunct occurs. The article also discusses several issues regarding the syntax and semantics of adjectives, possessors, and demonstratives, including what Partee (2006) calls familiar demonstratives, as well as anaphor binding.

[1]  Željko Bošković,et al.  On the timing of labeling: Deducing Comp-trace effects, the Subject Condition, the Adjunct Condition, and tucking in from labeling , 2016 .

[2]  Aida Talić,et al.  Extraordinary complement extraction: PP-complements and inherently case-marked nominal complements , 2014 .

[3]  Ž. Bošković.  Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  Ken Safir,et al.  One True Anaphor , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[5]  Jelena Runic,et al.  A New Look at Clitics, Clitic Doubling, and Argument Ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic , 2014 .

[6]  Miloje Despić,et al.  Binding and the Structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian , 2013, Linguistic Inquiry.

[7]  José Riqueros.  Spanish Nominal(ization) Patterns , 2013 .

[8]  Željko Bošković,et al.  TRACES DO NOT HEAD ISLANDS: WHAT CAN PF DELETION RESCUE? , 2013 .

[9]  I-Ta Chris Hsieh,et al.  On word order, binding relations, and plurality in Chinese noun phrases , 2013 .

[10]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  Anaphor Binding Domain , 2013 .

[11]  C. D. Mitchell.  Barriers , 2012, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing.

[12]  Marijana Marelj,et al.  Bound-Variable Anaphora and Left Branch Condition , 2011 .

[13]  Miloje Despic,et al.  Syntax in the Absence of Determiner Phrase , 2011 .

[14]  Masahiko Takahashi.  Case, Phases, and Nominative/Accusative Conversion in Japanese , 2010 .

[15]  Glyn Hicks.  The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations , 2009 .

[16]  A. C. Quicoli,et al.  Anaphora by Phase , 2008 .

[17]  Larisa Zlatic,et al.  The structure of the Serbian noun phrase , 2008 .

[18]  Jochen Trommer,et al.  A phase-based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking , 2008 .

[19]  Ángel J. Gallego,et al.  Sub-extraction from subjects: A phase theory account , 2007 .

[20]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction , 2007 .

[21]  C. Boeckx.  Some Notes on Bounding , 2007 .

[22]  eljko Bokovi.  On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  Shi-Zhe Huang.  Property Theory, Adjectives, and Modification in Chinese , 2006 .

[24]  Youngmi Jeong,et al.  The Landscape of Applicatives , 2006 .

[25]  Anikó Lipták,et al.  Have=be+Prep(osition) : New evidence for the preposition incorporation analysis of clausal possession , 2006 .

[26]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivations in minimalism , 2006 .

[27]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  The Domain of Agreement , 2005 .

[28]  Réjean Canac-Marquis,et al.  Phases and binding of reflexives and pronouns in English , 2005, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[29]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  A Gap in the ECM Paradigm , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[30]  Zeljko Boskovic,et al.  On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP , 2005 .

[31]  Ken Hiraiwa,et al.  Dimensions of symmetry in syntax : agreement and clausal architecture , 2005 .

[32]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives, and definiteness , 2004 .

[33]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  The dynamics of islands: speculations on the locality of movement , 2003 .

[34]  Maria Emma Ticio,et al.  On the Structure of DPs , 2003 .

[35]  Kleanthes K. Grohmann,et al.  Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of movement dependencies , 2003 .

[36]  A. Caink.  On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface : cliticization and related phenomena ( North-Holland Linguistic Series : Linguistic Variations , 2003 .

[37]  K Abels,et al.  Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding , 2003 .

[38]  T. Ernst.  The Syntax of Adjuncts , 2002 .

[39]  J. G. Rexach,et al.  NP Movement and Adjective Position in the DP Phases , 2001 .

[40]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures , 2001 .

[41]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Head-ing toward PF , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[42]  Peter Byrne,et al.  On The Edge , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  On Object Shift, Scrambling, and the PIC , 2000 .

[44]  David Pesetsky,et al.  T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[45]  M. Saito,et al.  Subject Predication within IP and DP , 1999 .

[46]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[47]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[48]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[49]  Masatoshi Koizumi.  Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax , 1998 .

[50]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  INTEGRATING LEXICAL AND FORMAL SEMANTICS: GENITIVES, RELATIONAL NOUNS, AND TYPE-SHIFTING , 1998 .

[51]  Liliana Sánchez,et al.  Syntactic structures in nominals : a comparative study of Spanish and Southern Quechua , 1996 .

[52]  Anders Holmberg,et al.  The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax , 1995 .

[53]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Polysynthesis Parameter , 1995 .

[54]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[55]  Kyle B. Johnson.  Object positions , 1991 .

[56]  Anne Zribi-Hertz.  Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse , 1989 .

[57]  Howard K. Wettstein,et al.  Themes from Kaplan , 1989 .

[58]  C. Rudin.  On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting , 1988 .

[59]  DAVID LEBEAUX,et al.  LOCALITY AND ANAPHORIC BINDING , 1985 .

[60]  Josef Vachek,et al.  Β. FUNCTIONAL SYNTAX , 1975 .

[61]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar , 1970 .