On the nature of associative information in recognition memory

In a typical associative-recognition task, participants must distinguish between intact word pairs (both words previously studied together) and rearranged word pairs (both words previously studied but as part of different pairs). The familiarity of the individual items on this task is uninformative because all of the items were seen before, so the only way to solve the task is to rely on associative information. Prior research suggests that associative information is recall-like in nature and may therefore be an all-or-none variable. The present research reports several experiments in which some pairs were strengthened during list presentation. The resulting hit rates and false alarm rates, and an analysis of the corresponding receiver operating characteristic plots, suggest that participants rely heavily on item information when making an associative-recognition decision (to no avail) and that associative information may be best thought of as a some-or-none variable.

[1]  S. Clark,et al.  List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[2]  D. Westerman The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. , 1992 .

[4]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992 .

[5]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  D. Callan,et al.  Forced-choice associative recognition: implications for global-memory models , 1993 .

[7]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Associative processing during rote rehearsal. , 1983 .

[8]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[9]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[10]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  Strengthening associations: duration, attention, or relations? , 1983 .

[12]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Recognition Memory for Item and Associative Information: A Comparison of Forgetting Rates , 1991 .

[13]  J. C. Ogilvie,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic curve parameters , 1968 .

[14]  J. Greeno,et al.  Evidence of different degrees of learning based on different tests of retention , 1968 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[16]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[17]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[18]  B. Murdock Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). , 1997 .

[19]  B. Murdock A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[20]  M. Humphreys Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval , 1978 .

[21]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  J T Wixted,et al.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  A. Yonelinas Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[25]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[26]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock , 1991 .